Main Article Content

Abstract

Covid-19 pandemic has a significant impact on various aspects of life, both individually, organizationally and nationally. The decision of various countries in the world to do a "lockdown" in order to limit the transmission of the plague has an impact on continuity of economic wheels to education. Educational institutions began to close because of scarcity of students and difficulties in covering operational costs so that many teachers and management were laid off. For educational institutions that still survive must play a strategy to stay afloat and maintain their students able to learn, with the policy ‘Work from Home’ and ‘School from Home’. The pandemic to this day is not over yet and it is predicted that it will last long until the antivirus is found. However, in anticipation of bankruptcy, the government adopted the adaptation of new habits (New Normal), habits that emphasize the implementation of health protocols in every activity. To carry out health protocols, educational institutions change the learning patterns from learning in classrooms to online learning. This has an impact on lecturers with demands to adapt quickly to existing changes. This study tries to analyze and examine the ability of lecturers to adapt learning communication models from classroom-based learning to online-based learning. With a hope that this research will become a reference for the developed communication model and its application in an adaptation of new habits (New Normal). The study was conducted by examining the results of previous studies and in-depth interviews with lecturers to get a diverse picture so that generic conclusions can be drawn.

Keywords

Communication Learning Communication Online Learning Classroom Learning Learning Environment

Article Details

How to Cite
Raharjo, J. S. D., Hendartho, D., Susanti, E., & Ekasari, R. (2021). Changes Of Learning Communication Models In New Normal Adaptation: From Classroom Learning To Distance Learning Environment. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 2(4), 308-317. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijjm.v2i4.386

References

  1. Baeten, Kyndt, Struyven, & Dochy. (2020). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review,, 5(3), 243-260. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001
  2. Barnlund, D. C. (2008). A transactional model of communication. In. C. D. Mortensen (Eds.), Communication Theory 2nd ed. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction.
  3. Berlo, D. (1960). Process of Communication: An Introduction to Theory and Practice. Cengage Learning. Flannery, T. J. (1995). Developing lesson plans. Fire Engineering, 148, 16-18.
  4. Bertrand JT (1978), Communications Pretesting Chicago: Community and Familyy Study Center, University of Chicago
  5. Corona Virus Update. (2020, August 04). Retrieved from https://www.worldometers.info/: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/indonesia/
  6. December, J. (1997). Notes on defining of computer-mediated communication. Computer-Mediated Communication Magazine, 3(1).
  7. Herring, S. C. (Ed.). (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (Vol. 39). John Benjamins Publishing.
  8. Keyton, J. (2011). Communication and Organizational Culture: A Key to Understanding Work Experiences. New York: SAGE.
  9. Kinshuk, C. W. (2005, July 5-8). Cyber Schooling Framework: Improving Mobility and Situated Learning. Proceedings-5th International Conference an advanced Learning technologies, 290-292. Doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2005.99
  10. Lewis, B. M., & Gorlin, R. (1952). Effects of hypoxia on pulmonary circulation of the dog. American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 170(3), 574-587. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1952.170.3.574
  11. Ramakrisnan , P., Yahya, Y., Hasrol, M. H., & Aziz, A. A. (2012). Blended Learning: A Suitable Frame work For E-Learning In Higher Education. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 67, 513-526. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.356
  12. Shanon, C.E.A. (1949). Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal., 379- 423, 623-656. Retrieved from https://people.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/others/shannon/entropy/entropy.pdf
  13. Stephenson, J., Brown, C., & Griffin, D. (2008). Electronic delivery of lectures in the university environment: An empirical comparison of three delivery styles. Computational and Eduational, 50(3), 640-651. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.08.007
  14. Suramnya Proyeksi Pertumbuhan Ekonomi RI Versi Lembaga Dunia. (2020, 06 29). Retrieved from Kompas.com: https://money.kompas.com/read/2020/06/29/134200026/suramnya-proyeksi-pertumbuhan-ekonomi-ri-versi-lembaga-dunia-?page=all
  15. Soekartawi (2002), e-learning, Konsep dan Aplikasinya, Bahan ceramah/Makalah disampaikan pada Seminar yang diselenggarakan oleh Balitbang Depdiknas, Jakarta, 18 Desember 2002
  16. Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV. ALFABETA
  17. Wardlaw, J. M., Murray, V., Berge, E., & Del Zoppo, G. J. (2014). Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, (7).