Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research analyzes the deployment of Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) in South Korea’s foreign policy and its impact on relations with China. The study examines why South Korea took a compromising approach through the Three No’s Policy despite implementing the THAAD system as a deterrence against North Korea. Through James Rosenau’s Foreign Policy Theory with five factors (systemic, societal, governmental, idiosyncratic, and role sources), this research fills a gap in literature on decision-making dynamics in East Asian security dilemmas. The study employs qualitative methods with case study analysis, relying on primary and secondary sources including policy documents, official government statements, and bilateral economic data. Results indicate that economic dependence on China and domestic pressure became dominant factors in South Korea’s compromising decision, outweighing considerations of alliance with the United States. These findings imply that in an era of economic interdependence, even countries facing direct security threats may be forced to balance security interests with economic concerns.

Keywords

Foreign Policy THAAD Three No’s Policy

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Liani, J. N., Rezasyah, T., & Heryadi, R. D. (2025). Dynamics of South Korea’s Three No’s Policy: Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Deployment and China Relations Analysis. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 6(3), 1078-1094. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v6i3.1787

References

  1. Allison, G. (1971). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis.
  2. Bae, J. Y. (2010). South Korean strategic thinking toward North Korea: The evolution of the engagement policy and its impact upon U.S.-ROK relations. Asian Survey, 50(2), 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2010.50.2.335
  3. Bindra, S. (2019). Analysing Foreign Policy. World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues, Volume 3. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48531048
  4. Byong-su, P. (2017). South Korea’s “three no’s” announcement key to restoring relations with China. https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_international/817213.html
  5. Cho, P., & Lim, J. C. (2018). North Korea’s Foreign Policymaking and Nuclear Weapons. In Asian Survey (Vol. 58, Issue 2, pp. 320–340). University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/AS.2018.58.2.320
  6. Christensen, T. J., Norton, W. W., York, N., & London, ·. (2015). The China Challenge: Shaping the Choices of a rising Power.
  7. Chun, C. (2015). EAI Working Paper EAI Middle Power Diplomacy Initiative Policy Recommendation Policy Recommendation for South Korea’s Middle Power Diplomacy.
  8. Chunyan, L., & Wansheng, X. (2017, June 21). Domestic Cognition and Position on THAAD Deployment in South Korea. https://www.caifc.org.cn/index.php?m=content&c=index&a=show&catid=22&id=528
  9. Coblentz, D., & Pabian, F. (2017, March 10). North Korea’s Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site: Analysis Reveals Its Potential for Additional Testing with Significantly Higher Yields. Https://Www.38north.Org/2017/03/Punggye031017/.
  10. Cossa, R. A., & Khanna, J. (1997). East Asia: Economic Interdependence and Regional Security. In Asia and the Pacific (Vol. 73, Issue 2).
  11. Dewi Sejati, M. (2020). South Korea’s Interests in THAAD Development Cooperation with the United States. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i3.6314
  12. Easley, L.-E. (2017). From Strategic Patience to Strategic Uncertainty: Trump, North Korea, and South Korea’a New President.
  13. Ekmektsioglou, E., & Lee, J. Y. (2022). North Korea, missile defense, and U.S.-China security dilemma. Pacific Review, 35(4), 587–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2020.1862285
  14. Fahmi Akbar, C., & Rustam, I. (n.d.). Respon Pemerintah Tiongkok Terhadap Penyebaran Sistem Pertahanan Anti-Rudal Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Amerika Serikat di Korea Selatan (Vol. 4, Issue 1).
  15. Gao, B. (2022). Research on Korean Foreign Policy since Park Geun-hye Administration from the Perspective of Neoclassical Realism-A Case Study of the THAAD Issue. In BCP Social Sciences & Humanities HASS (Vol. 2022).
  16. Gong, X. (2017). THAAD and China’s Trade Policy with South Korea. China and WTO Review, 3(1), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.14330/cwr.2017.3.1.09
  17. Haesebrouck, T., & Joly, J. (2021). Foreign Policy Change: From Policy Adjustments to Fundamental Reorientations. In Political Studies Review (Vol. 19, Issue 3, pp. 482–491). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920918783
  18. Herz, J. H. (1950). Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. In Source: World Politics (Vol. 2, Issue 2).
  19. Holsti, K. J. (1970). National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy Introduction*. In Source: International Studies Quarterly (Vol. 14, Issue 3).
  20. Inthaly, A., Risdhianto, A., & Sarjito, A. (2022). The Reason South Korea Approved The Placement of A High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) Terminal System in 2016. JESS (Journal of Education on Social Science, 6, 71–77. https://doi.org/10.24036/jess.v6i1
  21. Jaewoo, C. (2018). South Korean Politics and Foreign Policy in 2017 and 2018.
  22. Jeong, M. S. (2024). South Korea’s middle power diplomacy and the South China Sea disputes. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 78(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2024.2337895
  23. Jervis, R. (1978). COOPERATION UNDER THE SECURITY DILEMMA.
  24. Ji-Eun, K. (2011). “Korean Wave” In China: It’s Impact on the South Korean - Chinese Relations.
  25. Jo, E. A. (2020). Double Allegiance: Moon Jae-in’s Strategy amid US-China Rivalry. https://theasanforum.org/double-allegiance-moon-jae-ins-strategy-amid-us-china-rivalry/
  26. Jung, S. C. (2018). Lonely China, Popular United States: Power Transition and Alliance Politics in Asia. Pacific Focus, 33(2), 260–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.12118
  27. Kanellopoulos, A. N. (2023). Security Dilemma Between USA and China: A Strategic Perception Approach. HAPSc Policy Briefs Series, 4(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.12681/hapscpbs.35183
  28. Kang, D. C. (2009). Between Balancing and Bandwagoning: South Korea’s Response to China. In Source: Journal of East Asian Studies (Vol. 9, Issue 1). https://about.jstor.org/terms
  29. Kelly, R. (2019). Moon Jae-in’s foreign policy reorientation. Lowy Institute. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/moon-jae-s-foreign-policy-reorientation
  30. Kim, E., & Cha, V. (2016). Between a Rock and a Hard Place:: South Korea’s Strategic Dilemmas with China and the United States. Policy, 21, 101–122. https://doi.org/10.2307/24905094
  31. Kim, I., & Park, S. (2019). Deterrence Under Nuclear Asymmetry: THAAD and the Prospects for Missile Defense on the Korean Peninsula. Contemporary Security Policy, 40(2), 165–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2018.1558750
  32. Kong, W. N. (2022). Economic Effect and Resolution Idea of the THAAD Political Conflict on South Korea’s Exports to China. Chinese Economy, 55(2), 88–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10971475.2021.1930300
  33. Korean Economic Institute. (2018). The Economic Impact of THAAD on South Korra - China Relations. Http://Keia.Org/Publication/Economic-Impact-Thaad-South-Korea-China-Relations.
  34. KU, Y. (2019). Privatized Foreign Policy? Explaining the Park Geun-hye Administration’s Decision-making Process. Korea, 59.
  35. Lee, B. (2016). THAAD and the Sino-South Korean Strategic Dilemma. US THAAD Deployment in South Korea Upsets Strategic Balance in Northeast Asia,
  36. Lee, C. M., & Botto, K. (2018). President Moon Jae-in and the Politics of Inter-Korean Détente. https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2018/11/president-moon-jae-in-and-the-politics-of-inter-korean-detente?lang=en
  37. Lee, S. H., & Paik, W. (2018). Is South Korea Leaning Toward China? Questioning the Contemporary Application of the Japanese Narrative About the Historical Korean Peninsula–China Linkage. Pacific Focus, 33(2), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.12117
  38. Leofarhan, L., & Azzqy, A. A. R. (2018). Kerjasama Militer Korea Selatan dan Amerika Serikat dalam Penempatan Thaad Sebagai Respon atas Uji Coba Misil Balistik Korea Utara Periode 2013-2017.
  39. Lim, D. J. (2019). Chinese Economic Coercion during the THAAD Dispute. https://theasanforum.org/chinese-economic-coercion-during-the-thaad-dispute/
  40. Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance. (2022, November). North Korea’s Missile Threat and Proliferation. Https://Missiledefenseadvocacy.Org/Missile-Threat-and-Proliferation/Todays-Missile-Threat/North-Korea/.
  41. Missile Defense Project. (2021). North Korean Missile Launches & Nuclear Tests: 1984 - Present.
  42. Nikitin, M. B. (2013). North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons: Technical Issues. www.crs.gov
  43. Oknim, C. (2018). Values, Governance, and International Relations: The Case of South Korea.
  44. O’Neil, A. (2013). Asia, the Us and Extended Nuclear Deterrence: Atomic Umbrellas in the Twenty-First Century.
  45. Sankaran, J., & Fearey, B. L. (2017). Missile Defense and Strategic Stability: Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) in South Korea. Contemporary Security Policy, 38(3), 321–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2017.1280744
  46. Sarah, K. (2016). Thaad Decision May Have Major Diplomatic Fallout. https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/2016/07/11/politics/Thaad-decision-may-have-major-diplomatic-fallout/3021159.html
  47. Seliger, H. B. (2024, June 17). South Korea’s Foreign Policy. https://europe.hss.de/en/news/detail/south-koreas-foreign-policy-news11793/
  48. Snyder, S. (2018). South Korea at the Crossroads: Autonomy and Alliance in an Era of Rival Powers.
  49. Stangarone, T. (2019, October 30). Did South Korea’s Three Noes Matter? Not So Much. https://thediplomat.com/2019/10/did-south-koreas-three-noes-matter-not-so-much/
  50. Swaine, M. D. (2017). Chinese Views on South Korea’s Deployment of THAAD. 1–15.
  51. Tang, S. (2009). The Security Dilemma: A Conceptual Analysis. Security Studies, 18(3), 587–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410903133050
  52. The Diplomat. (2015). South Korea’s Economic Dependence on China. https://thediplomat.com/2015/09/south-koreas-economic-dependence-on-china/
  53. The Diplomat. (2023). South Korea’s Economic Security Dilemma – The Diplomat. 2023. https://thediplomat.com/2023/01/south-koreas-economic-security-dilemma/
  54. The Korea Herald. (2017). Moon’s Balanced Diplomacy . https://www.koreaherald.com/article/1494720
  55. The Washington Post. (2018). The Pentagon has officially canceled military exercises with South Korea. Here’s what comes next. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/06/21/the-pentagon-has-now-officially-canceled-military-exercises-with-south-korea-heres-what-comes-next/
  56. Trezza, C. (2018, February 13). The THAAD Deployment in South Korea: A Challenge and An Opportunity . https://www.apln.network/analysis/commentaries/the-thaad-deployment-in-south-korea-a-challenge-and-an-opportunity
  57. Yang, F. W. T. (2019). Asymmetrical Interdependence and Sanction: China’s Economic Retaliation over South Korea’s THAAD Deployment. Issues and Studies, 55(4). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013251119400083
  58. Zhang, B. (2011). The Security Dilemma in the U.S.-China military Relationship: The Prospects for Arms Control. Asian Survey, 51(2), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1525/AS.2011.51.2.311
  59. Zhao, T. (2016). China and South Korea’s Path to Consensus on THAAD . https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2016/10/china-and-south-koreas-path-to-consensus-on-thaad?lang=en