Main Article Content

Abstract

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed digital banking practices, particularly through the adoption of hyper-personalised customer experiences. Despite this growth, comparative empirical evidence on how customers perceive AI-driven strategies across competing digital banks remains limited. This study investigates differences in customer perceptions of Integrated Marketing Communication (IMC), AI Personalization, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) attributes, Kano needs categories, and overall customer satisfaction among users of three digital banks in Jakarta (Bank X, Bank Y, and Bank Z). A comparative quantitative approach was employed, involving 300 respondents selected through purposive and quota sampling. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and Tukey HSD tests. The findings indicate that Bank Y consistently achieves the highest mean scores across all constructs, reflecting strong perceptual leadership. Significant differences among the banks were confirmed, with further analysis revealing that TAM-related attributes and performance needs have become parity factors for certain bank pairs. In contrast, AI Personalization and excitement needs emerge as key differentiators. These results suggest that in increasingly mature digital banking markets, competitive advantage is no longer determined by basic functional performance, but by the ability to deliver proactive, contextual, and emotionally engaging AI-based experiences. This study contributes to the IMC, TAM, and Kano literature by highlighting a shift in customer expectations, where AI Personalization plays a central role in generating attractive quality and enhancing customer satisfaction.

Keywords

AI Personalization Digital Banking IMC TAM Kano Model Customer Satisfaction

Article Details

How to Cite
Husada, S., Yulianti, W., Yunus, U., & Nugraha, T. (2026). AI-Driven Marketing Communication and Customer Satisfaction in Jakarta’s Digital Banks. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 7(1), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v7i1.1986

References

  1. Abulsaoud Ahmed Younis, R., & Adel, H. M. (2020). Artificial intelligence strategy, creativity-oriented HRM and knowledge-sharing quality: Empirical analysis of individual and organisational performance of AI-powered businesses. The Annual International Conference of the British Academy of Management (BAM).
  2. Alnaser, F. M., Rahi, S., Alghizzawi, M., & Ngah, A. H. (2023). Does artificial intelligence (AI) boost digital banking user satisfaction? Integration of expectation confirmation model and antecedents of artificial intelligence enabled digital banking. Heliyon, 9(8).
  3. Ameen, N., Tarhini, A., Reppel, A., & Anand, A. (2021). Customer experiences in the age of artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106548.
  4. Anwar, M., Astuti, W., & Sugito, P. (2024). Perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, intention to use digital banks and the role of trust as mediating variables. KnE Social Sciences, 9(29), 95–108.
  5. Chen, Y., & Yang, S. (2021). AI in digital banking: A customer-centric approach. Journal of Financial Innovation, 12(3), 233–245.
  6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340.
  7. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., & others. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994.
  8. Hoyer, W. D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., & Singh, S. S. (2010). Consumer cocreation in new product development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283–296.
  9. Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). Artificial intelligence in service: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Service Research, 24(1), 3–15.
  10. Husada, S. (2024). Implementation of Bank as a Service Marketing Communication Strategy in Increasing the number of customers on blu by BCA Digital. 3(1), 27–39.
  11. Husada, S., Yunus, U., Ramonita, L., & McMahon, M. (2025). Community engagement in digital banking: Insights from Jakarta and Perth. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 13(1), 160–182.
  12. Kano, N. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control, 31(4), 147–156.
  13. Kibaroglu, O. (2022). Gojek as infrastructure: Street smart technology of Indonesia. National University of Singapore (Singapore).
  14. Kliatchko, J. (2008). Revisiting the IMC construct: A revised definition and four pillars. International Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 133–160.
  15. Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96.
  16. Leung, K., & Wong, P. (2020). AI-driven personalization in emerging markets: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(5–6), 587–605.
  17. Lin, F.-H., Tsai, S., Lee, Y.-C., Hsiao, C.-F., Zhou, J., Wang, J., & Shang, Z. (2017). Empirical research on Kano’s model and customer satisfaction. PLOS ONE, 12, e0183888. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183888
  18. Malhotra, N. K. (2020). Marketing research: an applied prientation. pearson.
  19. Mubarok, M. U., Sari, M. I., Wibowo, Y. G., & Mathew, R. (2024). Comparative Study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Utilization in Digital Marketing Strategies Between Developed and Developing Countries: A Systematic Literature Review. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 6(1), 156–173.
  20. Nguyen, B., & Simkin, L. (2017). The Internet of Things (IoT) and marketing: the state of play, future trends and the implications for marketing. In Journal of marketing management (Vol. 33, Numbers 1–2, pp. 1–6). Taylor & Francis.
  21. Park, H., Lee, M., & Back, K.-J. (2021). Exploring the roles of hotel wellness attributes in customer satisfaction and dissatisfaction: application of Kano model through mixed methods. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(1), 263–285.
  22. Payne, A., & Frow, P. (2017). Relationship marketing: looking backwards towards the future. Journal of Services Marketing, 31(1), 11–15.
  23. Picolo, J. D., & Tontini, G. (2018). Integrating methods for the prioritization of innovations and improvements in services. Journal of Services Marketing, 32(7), 820–834.
  24. Pillai, R., Sivathanu, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020). Shopping intention at AI-powered automated retail stores (AIPARS). Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102207.
  25. Purwati, A., & Ariyani, N. (2025). Integrated Marketing Communication in Building Brand Equity in the Social Media Era. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 6(2), 610–629.
  26. Schultz, D. E., Kim, I., & Kang, K. (2014). Integrated marketing communication research: its limited past and huge potential. The Handbook of International Advertising Research, 455–483.
  27. Shankar, V., Kleijnen, M., Ramanathan, S., Rizley, R., Holland, S., & Morrissey, S. (2016). Mobile shopper marketing: Key issues, current insights, and future research avenues. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 34(1), 37–48.
  28. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
  29. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425–478.
  30. Wirtz, J., Den Ambtman, A., Bloemer, J., Horváth, C., Ramaseshan, B., de Klundert, J., Gurhan Canli, Z., & Kandampully, J. (2013). Managing brands and customer engagement in online brand communities. Journal of Service Management, 24(3), 223–244.
  31. Zhang, T., Luo, X., & Jebarajakirthy, C. (2020). Cultural barriers to AI adoption in financial services. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 159, 120194.
  32. Zhang, T., & Wei, X. (2020). Cultural differences in AI adoption. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(1), 112–128.