Main Article Content

Abstract

To support regional autonomy the central government issued Law (UU) no. 23 of 2014 which has given authority to the Regional Government to manage and regulate its own government, this includes regional financial management which ultimately must be accountable to the public through the presentation of financial which are an element of Regional Financial Information. To carry out this mandate, the Simeulue Regency Government since 2007 has used the SIMDA Finance application as an information system for its financial management so that it can manage finances in an accountable and transparent manner. hinder the performance of the Financial SIMDA, which In the course of its implementation, the Simeulue Regency Government has found obstacles that gradually fix these inhibiting factors and implement supporting factors that can improve the performance of the Financial SIMDA. This study aims to determine the factors that hinder and support the implementation of SIMDA Finance in Simeulue Regency. This research method uses qualitative, research subjects consist of SIMDA Finance users who have used the application for more than three years, data collection techniques using observations, interviews and documents, data validity techniques using data triangulation. data analysis technique using NVIVO. The results show that the five main factors that support the implementation of SIMDA Finance in Simeulue Regency are software, leader commitment, network, hardware, and attitude of the implementer. Meanwhile, the five main factors that hinder the implementation of SIMDA Finance are human resources, software, networks, hardware and the attitude of the implementers. The factors that are the same between supporters and obstacles to SIMDA Finance are caused by researchers looking at different sides of these factors in implementing SIMDA Finance.

Keywords

Human Resources Network, Hardware Software Leader Commitment Implementer Attitude SIMDA Finance

Article Details

How to Cite
Widowati, W., Sakir, A., & Malta, M. (2021). Analysis of Supporting and Inhibiting Factors in the Implementation of Financial SIMDA . Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 2(4), 222-232. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v2i4.356

References

  1. Albaity, M., Md Noman, A. H., & Mallek, R. S. (2021). Trustworthiness, good governance and risk-taking in MENA countries. Borsa Istanbul Review, 21(4), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.12.002
  2. Anginer, D., Demirguc-Kunt, A., Simsir, S. A., & Tepe, M. (2021). Is short-term debt a substitute for or complementary to good governance? Borsa Istanbul Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.05.004
  3. Budiman, F., & Arza, F. I. (2013). Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model Dalam Kesuksesan Implementasi Sistem Informasi Manajamen Daerah. Jurnal Wahana Riset Akuntansi, 1(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/wra.v1i1.2315
  4. Machmud, R. (2013). Hubungan Sistem Informasi Manajemen dan Pelayanan Dengan Kinerja Pegawai Pada Rutan Makasar. Jurnal Capacity STIE AMKOP Makassar, 9(1), 78–85. https://repository.ung.ac.id/karyailmiah/show/145/hubungan-sistem-informasi-manajemen-dan-pelayanan-dengan-kinerja-pegawai-pada-rutan-makassar.html
  5. Mansoor, M. (2021). Citizens’ trust in government as a function of good governance and government agency’s provision of quality information on social media during COVID-19. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101597
  6. Omri, A., & Ben Mabrouk, N. (2020). Good governance for sustainable development goals: Getting ahead of the pack or falling behind? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 83, 106388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106388
  7. Pérez, F. M., Martinez, J. V. B., & Fonseca, I. L. (2021). Strategic IT alignment Projects. Towards Good Governance. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 76, 103514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2021.103514
  8. Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2016). Social responsibility and financial performance: The role of good corporate governance. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.001
  9. Rusydi, A. R., Palutturi, S., Noor, N. B., & Pasinringi, S. A. (2020). The implementation of good corporate governance (GCG) at public hospital in Indonesia: A literature review. Enfermería Clínica, 30, 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.10.057
  10. Sutejo, B. S. (2006). Internet Marketing: Konsep Dan Persoalan Baru Dunia Pemasaran. Jurnal Manajemen Maranatha, 6(1), 41–55. https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/111980/internet-marketing-konsep-dan-persoalan-baru-dunia-pemasaran
  11. Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N., & Mustikaningtiyas, F. (2021). Good corporate governance and corporate sustainability performance in Indonesia: A triple bottom line approach. Heliyon, 7(3), e06453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06453
  12. Yanuardi, Y., Vijge, M. J., & Biermann, F. (2021). Improving governance quality through global standard-setting? Experiences from the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Indonesia. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(3), 100905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2021.100905