Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 119 Download : 143

Main Article Content

Abstract

The KPU's communication target in general elections is to increase voter participation by giving them their voting rights in elections. Preliminary studies show that around 69.8% of 40 fishermen in Manggar District, East Belitung Regency, are still apathetic towards political processes such as elections and feel that their involvement in politics will have no impact. Therefore, the KPU then implemented an interpersonal communication strategy in an effort to increase the political efficacy of the fishing community in Manggar District. This study uses a qualitative descriptive method with data collection techniques of interviews, observation, and documentation. Data analysis used the Miles and Huberman interactive model, which consisted of the stages of data collection, data condensation, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of the study found that the East Belitung KPU, together with members of the Manggar District Election Committee (PPK), held face-to-face meetings and discussions with fishermen groups as part of the KPU's outreach activities to the public. KPU has been open and honest in conveying any information related to the election, understanding the problems felt by fishermen, and providing support in the form of providing election education and knowledge to fishermen. In addition, KPU has also tried to build an atmosphere and interaction with fishermen to foster equality, as well as a communication approach that considers fishermen important. External factors such as the social environment or friends in the community and the candidate's vision and mission that can prosper the fishermen are factors that also influence the fishermen's perceptions and evaluations of elections and the political system in Indonesia.

Keywords

Strategy Interpersonal Communicatio Political Efficacy KPU Fishermen

Article Details

How to Cite
Asrikah, A., & Anom, E. (2023). Interpersonal Communication of the Election Commission as a Strategy in Efforts to Improve the Political Efficiency of the Fisherman Community in Manggar District, Belitung Timur Regency. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 4(1), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v4i1.643

References

  1. Akhrani, L., & Faizah., S. (2018). Kepercayaan Politik dan Partispasi Politik Pemilih Pemula. Jurnal MEDIAPSI, 4(1), 1–6.
  2. Anderson, M. R. (2010). Community Psychology, Political Efficacy, and Trust. Political Psychology, 31(1), 59–84.
  3. Cangara, H. (2008). Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  4. Cassia, F., & Magno, F. (2021). Antecedents of professionals’ self-efficacy in professional service firms: effects of external source credibility and content quality. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 36(13), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-11-2019-0485
  5. Chekirova, A. (2022). Social Media and Cross-Border Political Participation: A Case Study of Kyrgyz Migrants’ Online Activism. Social Sciences, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11080370
  6. Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizen Politics: Public Opinion And Political Parties In Advanced Industrial Democracies. CQ Press.
  7. Damsar. (2010). Pengantar Sosiologi Politik. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  8. Dyck, J. J., & Lascher, E. L. (2009). Direct democracy and political efficacy reconsidered. Political Behavior, 31(3), 401–427.
  9. Fauzie, R. (2014). Adaptasi dan Validasi Skala Political Trust dan Political Efficacy. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia (JP3I, 3(4).
  10. Greiner, M., & Lee, J. (2021). US companies and political influence: how business can read the government landscape better. Journal of Business Strategy, 42(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-09-2019-0178
  11. Haryono, D. (2019). Strategi KPU dalam meningkatkan partisipasi pemilih pada pemilihan Walikota dan Wakil Walikota Samarinda tahun 2015. Jurnal Administrative Reform, 6(2), 67–73.
  12. Hu, R., Sun, I. Y., & Wu, Y. (2015). Chinese trust in the police: the impact of political efficacy and participation. Social Science Quarterly, 96(4), 1012–1026.
  13. Ismail, Z. A. (2016). Komunikasi Interpersonal Untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Pegawai di PT. Trimuda Nuansa Citra Sidoarjo. Skripsi. Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi.
  14. Maschab, & Mashuri. (2014). Politik Pemerintahan Desa di Indonesia. Fisipol.
  15. Moleong, & J., L. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Edisi Revisi. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  16. Muhammad, A. (2010). Komunikasi Organisasi. Bumi Aksara.
  17. Mulyana, D. (2011). Ilmu Komunikasi: Suatu Pengantar. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  18. Mulyana, D. (2014). Ilmu Komunikasi: Suatu Pengantar. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  19. Niemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (2001). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 national election study. The American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1407– 1413.
  20. Parlee, C. E., Foley, P., López Gómez, M. A., Miah, M. R., Mather, C., & Stephenson, R. L. (2021). Full spectrum sustainability and a theory of access: Integrating social benefits into fisheries governance. Marine Policy, 134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104764
  21. Prabowo, P. A. (2020). Fenomena Self Efficacy Terhadap Partisipasi Masyarakat Pada Pilkada di Kabupaten Pasaman 2015. Jurnal Demokrasi Dan Politik Lokal, 2(2), 148–161.
  22. Putra, F. A., & Fauzi, A. (2020). Komunikasi KPU Dalam Menekan Golput di Jember. Jurnal Al-Hikmah, 18(2), 199–210.
  23. Putri, & Eka, T. (2017). Partisipasi politik Masyarakat Nelayan pada Pemilihan Umum Legislatif 2014 (Studi pada Masyarakat Nelayan Desa Busung Kecamatan Seri Kuala Lobam Kabupaten Bintan. Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji Tanjung Pinang.
  24. Rahman, M. M., & Rahaman, M. S. (2022). Psychological status of mass people in the capital city of Bangladesh during COVID-19: Do home quarantine challenges matter? Journal of Community Psychology, 50(5), 2090–2103. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22756
  25. Sabourin, E. (2022). Public Policies for Sustainable Territorial Development in Brazil: Between Clientelism and Participation. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053058
  26. Sari, & Laras., I. (2020). Politik Masyarakat Pesisir, (Studi Partisipasi Politik Masyarakat Nelayan Tambak Lorok Kelurahan Tanjung Mas Kota Semarang Terhadap Pemilihan Presiden Dan Pemilu Legislatif DPRD Kota Semarang 2019. Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik.
  27. Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
  28. Sugiyono, P. D. (2017). Metode penelitian bisnis: pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, kombinasi, dan R&D. In Penerbit CV (p. 225). Bandung.
  29. Suranto, & A.W. (2011). Komunikasi Interpersonal. Graha Ilmu.
  30. Utete, B., Kupika, O. L., Mahlatini, P., & Nyachowe, T. (2022). How local communities access, utilise and evaluate inland fisheries, and their influence on fishery conservation status in northern Zimbabwe. Water SA, 48(3), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.17159/wsa/2022.v48.i3.3885
  31. Verba, S., Schlozman, K., & Brady, H. (2005). Voice And Equality: Civic Voluntarism In American Politics. Harvard University Press.