Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze whether there is an influence between Non Performing Loans and Capital Adequacy Ratio both partially and simultaneously on the Profitability (ROA) of PT. Bank Central Asia, Tbk. The approach taken in this research is associative and quantitative. The population of this study was all subjects at PT. Bank Central Asia (BCA), Tbk for 44 years, namely 1974-2018 with a total sample of 9 years, namely 2010-2018. The sampling method is a purposive sampling method. While the data analysis technique uses classical assumptions, multiple linear regression, hypothesis testing (t-test and F test) and the coefficient of determination. The results of this study prove that Non-performing Loans do not affect the Return On Assets. However, Capital Adequacy Ratio has a significant effect on Return On Asset. While simultaneously this study proves that Non-Performing Loans and Capital Adequacy Ratio affect the Return On Assets at PT. Bank Central Asia, Tbk.

Keywords

Non Performing Loan, Capital Adequacy Ratio, Return On Asset

Article Details

References

  1. Abdullah, M. Faisal. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan. Cetakan Keempat, Penerbit Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.
  2. Algifari. (2013). Statistika Induktif: untuk Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Yogyakarta: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Manajemen YKPN.
  3. Bungin, Burhan.(2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Jakarta : Kencana.
  4. Brigham, E.F dan Houston, J.F. (2017). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
  5. Cok Istri D. R. Primadewi. (2015). Pengaruh Capital Adequacy Ratio, Non-Performing Loan Dan Dana Pihak Ketiga Pada Profitabilitas. E-Jurnal Akuntansi. Universitas Udayana 12.3 613-622. ISSN: 2302-8556.
  6. Fahmi, Irham. (2013). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Bandung : Alfabeta.
  7. Ghozali, Imam.(2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program (IBM SPSS). Edisi 8. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
  8. Indriantoro, N, Bambang Supomo. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis Untuk Akuntansi & Manajemen. Edisi 1. Cetakan ke-12. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
  9. Julius, R, Latumaerissa. (2014). Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lain. Jakarta : Salempa Empat.
  10. Kasmir.(2012). Manajemen Perbankan. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.
  11. Kasmir. (2015). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Edisi Satu. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  12. Mudrajat, K dan Suhardjono. (2011). Manajemen Perbankan Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
  13. Muhardi, Werner R. (2013) . Analisis Laporan Keuangan Proyeksi dan Valuasi Saham. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  14. Parlan.(2014). Impact of LDR, IPR, ACA, NPL, IRR and NOP to Toward Indonesia National Private Commercial Bank’s Cost-To-Income Ratio The 2nd IBEA International Conference on Business Economic and Accounting, Hongkong.
  15. Pandia, Frianto.(2012). Manajemen Dana dan Kesehatan Ban. Jakarta : Cetakan Pertama. PT. Rineka Cipta.
  16. Peraturan Bank Indonesia No. 15/12/PBI/2013 tentang Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. www.bi.go.id, Jakarta.
  17. Riyadi, Selamet. (2016). Banking Assets And Liability Management, Edisi Keempat, Jakarta : Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi & Bisnis, Universitas Indonesia.
  18. Sartono, Agus.(2015). Manajemen Keuangan dan Teori Aplikasi, Cetakan Keempat, Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada.
  19. Sofyan, M. (2019). Analysis Financial Performance of Rural Banks in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR), 3(3), pp. 255-262.
  20. Sofyan, M. (2019). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Keuangan BPR Syariah Di Indonesia. Sains Manajemen, 5(2), pp. 189-201.
  21. Sofyan, M. (2019). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Profitabilitas Bank Perkreditan Rakyat (BPR) di Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Inspirasi Bisnis dan Manajemen, 3(1), pp. 63-76.
  22. Surat Edaran Bank Indonesia No.13/24/DPNP tanggal 25 Oktober 2011 tentang Sistem Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum. www.bi.go.id, Jakarta.
  23. Taswan. (2015). Akuntansi Perbankan. UPP STIM YKPN, Yogyakarta.