Article Sidebar

Download
Pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 628 Download : 520

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research is a quantitative study that aims to determine the Millennial Generation Characteristics of Employee Engagement. The population in this study The study was conducted by taking samples of Millennials who are actively working at Micro Finance companies with a total of 150 respondents. The sample size was taken as many as 150 respondents, with probability sampling methods especially simple random sampling. Data collection was carried out through questionnaires. The analysis technique used is the PLS (Partial Least Square) analysis method. The results of this study indicate that the value of R- Square (R2) Employee Engagement is 0.786 and Employee Satisfaction is 0.647 thus indicating that the contribution of Grit, Worklife Balance, and Jon Resources variables to Employee Engagement and Employee Satisfaction are 0.786 or 78.6% and 0.647 or 64.7%. And the rest is influenced by other factors not examined.

Keywords

Employee Engagement, Grit, Job Resources, Worklife Balance, Employee

Article Details

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Manggabarani, A. S., Marzuki, F., & Mahendro. (2020). The Effect Of Milenial Generation Characteristics Of Job Satisfaction Relations And Employee Engagement. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 1(4), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijjm.v1i4.166

References

  1. Ardana, Komang, Mudiarta Utama, I Wayan, Ni Wayan Mujiati,. 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia . Yogyakarta; Graha Ilmu.
  2. Bakker, A.B., Leiter, M.P (2010). In Bakker, A.B & Leiter, M.P (Eds). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp.181-196). Psychology press: New York. Retrieved on www.http://www.psypress.com/common/sample- chapters/9781841697369.pdf
  3. Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M.C. (2005). Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(2), 170-180. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.170
  4. Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Hakanen JJ, Xanthopoulou D. 2007. Job resources Boost Work engagement, Particularly When Job demands Are High. Journal of Educational Psychology 2:274– 284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274
  5. Bencsik, A., Csikos, G., & Juhaz, T. (2016). Y and Z Generations at Workplaces. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(3), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2016.03.06
  6. Bencsik, A., & Machova, R. (2016, April). Knowledge Sharing Problems from the Viewpoint of Intergeneration Management. In ICMLG2016 - 4th International Conference on Management, Leadership, and Governance: ICMLG2016 (p.42). Academic Conferences and publishing limited.
  7. Dill, K. (2015). 7 Things Employers Should Know About The Gen Z Workforce, Forbes Magazin, 11.6. Retrieved March 16, 2016, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/kathryndill/2015/11/06/7-thingsemployers-should- know-about-the- gen-z-workforce/print/.
  8. Fatimah, H., Dharmawan, A. H., Sunarti, E., & Affandi, M. J. (2015). Pengaruh faktor karakteristik individu dan budaya organisasi terhadap keterikatan pegawai generasi x dan y. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 13(3), 402-409.
  9. Finney, M.I. (2010). Engagement: cara pintar membuat karyawan mencurahkan kemampuan terbaik untuk perusahaan. Penerjemah: Verawaty Pakpahan. Jakarta. Penerbit PPM.
  10. Krisbiyanto. (2013) Generasi Y Kurang Loyal terhadap Perusahaan? Retrieved on http://www.portalhr.com/komunitas/opini/generasi-y-kurang-loyal-terhadap-perusahaan/(17-5- 2014)
  11. Luthans, F., Peterson, S.J. (2002). Employee engagement and manager self-efficacy: implications for managerial effectiveness and development. Journal of Management Development Vol 21, No. 5, pp: 276-287
  12. Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  13. Titien. (2016). Penyusunan dan pengembangan alat ukur employee engagement. PSIKOHUMANIORA: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 1(1), 113-130.
  14. Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation Me: Why Today’s Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled—and More Miserable Than Ever Before. New York: Free Press.
  15. Paul, Mukucha. “The Mediation Effects of Perceived Service Quality in The Relationship between Employee Satisfaction and Customer Satisfaction”, Journal of Studies in Accounts and Economics, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 9-16, 2013.
  16. Scheimann, W.A. (2011). Alignment, capability, engagement: pendekatan baru talent management untuk mendongkrak kinerja organisasi. Penerjemah : Setyo Untoro. Jakarta. Penerbit PPM
  17. Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez- Roma, V. & Bakker, A.B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach”, Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.
  18. Sundaray, Bijaya Kumar. (2013). Employee Engagement: A Driver of Organizational. European Journal of Business and Management www.iiste.org . ISSN 2222-1905 (Paper) ISSN 22222839 (Online) Vol 3, No.8.
  19. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/gaya-hidup/20161215174236-277-179907/milenial-generasi-kutu- loncat-pengubah-gaya-kerja
  20. http://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20170918/15/690916/manajemen-sdm-ramah-millennials
  21. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/About-Deloitte/gx-millenial- survey-2016-exec-summary.pdf
  22. https://www.jobstreet.co.id/id/cms/employer/mempertahankan-generasi-millennial-5-cara-terbaik- dalam-rencana-suksesi/
  23. https://www.kalibrr.com/advice/2018/01/pekerjaan-yang-dicari-millennials http://www.growbold.comfiles/20090826-boldworkshop-sirotain.tuit.pdf, diakses 10 Juni 2013.