Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to see how the condition of the object/Tourist Attraction (TA) in Magelang Regency in Indonesia and its alternative development. This research uses a descriptive qualitative approach with case studies of 31 tourism objects which will then be investigated regarding their conditions and possible future developments. Research data were obtained by direct observation of the location of tourist objects and through semi-structured interviews. The results of this study illustrate that tourism objects in Magelang Regency are currently quite developed. However, this has not been able to attract general tourists to linger in the regency and provided an optimal contribution to regional income. This is because tourism objects in the regency other than Borobudur Temple have not been maximized for their existence and utilization. The Public-Private Partnership (PPP) scheme model can be an alternative to be applied in developing tourism objects accompanied by an appropriate Value for Money (VfM) analysis. Tourism objects in the form of cultural heritage can be developed through concession contracts, natural beauty can be developed through management contracts, and artificial objects can be developed through service contracts while taking into account the development needs of each tourism object. Local governments need to establish cooperation with the private sector with a Public-Private Partnership scheme accompanied by the preparation of strict regulations so that the implementation of cooperation in the context of developing tourism objects in the Magelang Regency can bring optimal benefits to all parties.

Keywords

Tourist Attraction Public-Private Partnership Value for Money

Article Details

Author Biographies

Agung Nur Probohudono, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Agung Nur Probohudono is a Lecturer at the Faculty of Economics and Business of Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia. He has taught public sector audit, public sector accounting, and public sector accounting systems. The focus of his current research is corporate governance, financial reporting, and public sector performance.

Djuminah, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Djuminah is a lecturer at the Sebelas Maret University Surakarta and an expert in the field of financial accounting and intermediate Accounting

Evi Gantyowati, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Evi Gantyowati is a lecturer at the Sebelas Maret University Surakarta and an expert in the field of accounting and corporate governance

How to Cite
Arifah, S., Probohudono, A. N., Djuminah, & Gantyowati, E. (2021). Alternative To Development of Tourist Attraction with Public Private Partnership Scheme in Magelang Regency. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 2(4), 262-272. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijjm.v2i4.271

References

  1. Akbar, D., & Ikhsan, K. (2019). Public-private partnership dalam pengoptimalan wisata Bintan Mangrove. MetaCommunication; Journal Of Communication Studies, 4(1), 128–136.
  2. Alireza, V., Mohammadreza, Y., Zin, R. M., Yahaya, N., & Noor, N. M. (2014). An enhanced multi-objective optimization approach for risk allocation in public-private partnership projects: A case study of Malaysia. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 41(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2013-0342
  3. Ameyaw, E. E., & Chan, A. P. C. (2015). Risk allocation in public-private partnership water supply projects in Ghana. Construction Management and Economics, 33(3), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2015.1031148
  4. Bisthomi, I., Saptono, H., & Suharto, R. (2016). Tinjauan yuridis perjanjian publik private partnership (PPP) antara pemerintah dengan swasta dalam penyediaan infrastruktur dengan skema build operate transfer (BOT) (studi kasus di PT PLN (Persero). Diponegoro Law Review, 5(2), 1–12.
  5. Bjarstig, T., & Sandstrom, C. (2017). Public-private partnerships in a Swedish rural context - A policy tool for the authorities to achieve sustainable rural development? Journal of Rural Studies Journal, 49, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.009
  6. Ferri, K. (2018, Juli 8). Fasilitas Pendukung Wisata Minim, Lama Tinggal Wisatawan di Kabupaten Magelang Hanya 3 Jam. Diperoleh 29 November 2018 dari https://jogja.tribunnews.com/2018/07/08/fasilitas-pendukung-wisata-minim-lama-tinggal-wisatawan-di-kabupaten-magelang-hanya-3-jam
  7. Hadji, R., Achour, Y., & Hamed, Y. (2017, November). Using GIS and RS for slope movement susceptibility mapping: comparing AHP, LI and LR methods for the Oued Mellah Basin, NE Algeria. In Euro-Mediterranean conference for environmental integration (pp. 1853-1856). Springer, Cham.
  8. Irsyad, M., Hamid, D., & Mawardi, M. K. (2017). Implementasi strategi pengembangan wisata Kebun Binatang Surabaya sebagai destinasi wisata di Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), 42(2), 59–66.
  9. Ismowati, M. (2016). Kajian urgensi public private partnerships di Kota Bandung. TRANSPARANSI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, VIII(2), 143–151.
  10. Jacobson, C. and Ok Choi, S. (2008). Success factors: public works and public‐private partnerships. International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 637-657. doi: 10.1108/09513550810896514
  11. Kemenkeu (2018). Skema KPBU Bagi Pembangunan Infrastruktur di Daerah. Diperoleh tanggal 28 Februari 2019 dari https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/publikasi/berita/
  12. Kriswibowo, A., Pramestya, E. A., & Prasetyo, K. (2020). Implementation of public private partnership in the development of tourism in Sumenep District. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 10(1), 213–224.
  13. Mahmudi. (2007). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik, Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
  14. Mahsyar, A. (2015). Public private partnership: Kolaborasi pemerintah dan swasta dalam pengelolaan asset publik di Kota Makassar. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 12(April), 71–80.
  15. Mardiasmo. (2009). “Perpajakan”. Edisi Revisi 2009. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
  16. Mohamad, R., Ismail, S., & Mohd Said, J. (2018). Performance indicators for public private partnership (PPP) projects in Malaysia. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 34(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-04-2017-0018
  17. Moleong, L. J. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  18. Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Magelang No 4 Tahun 2015 Rencana Induk Pembangunan Kepariwisataan Nasional Tahun 2014-2034. 11 Juni 2015. Lembaran Daerah Kabupaten Magelang Tahun 2015 Nomor 4. Kabupaten Magelang. Diperoleh 2 desember 2019 dari http://jdih.magelangkab.go.id/hukum/detail/peraturan-daerah/4/2015
  19. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No 50 Tahun 2011 Rencana Induk Pembangunan Kepariwisataan Nasional Tahun 2010-2025. 2 Desember 2011. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2011 Nomor 125. Diperoleh 2 Desember 2019 dari https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/5183/pp-no-50-tahun-2011
  20. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia No 38 Tahun 2015 Kerjasama Pemerintah dengan Badan Usaha dalam Penyediaan Infrastruktur. 20 Maret 2015. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2015 Nomor 62. Diperoleh 2 Desember 2019 dari https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/fullText/2015/38TAHUN2015PERPRES.pdf
  21. Pongsiri, N. (2002). Regulation and public‐private partnerships. International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 487-495. doi: 10.1108/09513550210439634
  22. Priadi, G. (2016, Agustus 23). Penerapan Konsep Public Private Partnership (PPP) Dan Konsep New Public Management (NPM) Dalam Meningkatkan Pemanfaatan Aset Negara. Diperoleh 15 Nopember 2018 dari
  23. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/artikel/baca/11075/Penerapan-Konsep-Public-Private-Partnership-PPP-Dan-Konsep-New-Public-Management-NPM-Dalam-Meningkatkan-Pemanfaatan-Aset-Negara.html
  24. Setyawati, D. A., & Purnaweni, H. (2014). Implementasi kebijakan kerjasama pemerintah dengan swasta (public private partnership) dalam pengelolaan sampah di TPA Jatibarang. E-Jurnal Katalogis, 2, 15–22.
  25. Susantono, B., & Berawi, M. A. (2012). Perkembangan kebijakan pembiayaan infrastruktur transportasi berbasis kerjasama pemerintah swasta di Indonesia. Jurnal Transportasi, 12(2), 93–102. http://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/journaltransportasi/article/view/475
  26. Tukuboya, M. W., Nurjaman, H. N., & Suryani, F. (2018). Public private partnership pada konservasi dan pembangunan infrastruktur pengaman pantai; Studi kasus Bali. IKRA-ITH; Jurnal Sains & Teknologi, 2(1), 32–40.
  27. Widianto, Y. (2017). Hambatan public private partnership antara pemerintah Kota Surabaya dan PT Star dalam pengelolaan idle asset di Taman Remaja Surabaya. Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Airlangga.
  28. Yuan, J., Chan, A. P. C., Xiong, W., Skibniewski, M. J., & Li, Q. (2015). Perception of residual value risk in public private partnership projects: Critical review. Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(3), 04014041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000256