Main Article Content


This research is intended to explore the influence of gender diversity on financial and bank environmental performance. In addition, in order to strengthen the impact of gender diversity on financial performance and environmental performance, this research also tests the moderating effect of financial technology adoption. The population in this study examines banks that received the 2022 Digital Banking Awards, which is the research period from 2017-2022. The proportion of women on the Board of Commissioners and the Board of Directors is a proxy for gender diversity. This research method uses random effect models and fixed effect models in regression equations that test financial performance. Meanwhile, the regression model that tests environmental performance uses logit regression. This study shows that the percentage of females on boards has an impact on financial results, but not on environmental performance. The financial and environmental performance is not affected by the gender ratio in the board of directors. Other results show that, although financial technology can enhance the influence of women's representation on boards regarding environmental performance, but it does not have an impact on financial performance. On the other hand, the impact on financial and environmental performance of the proportion of women on the board of directors is not reduced by the adoption of financial technology. The implications of these findings provide input for regulators to determine the threshold for women's involvement on the board of directors.


Gender Diversity Sustainability Performance Financial technology Adoption

Article Details

How to Cite
Nugroho, D. S., & Anita. (2023). Gender Diversity and Sustainability Performance: The Role of Financial Technology Adoption as Moderator . Ilomata International Journal of Tax and Accounting, 4(4), 799-812.


  1. Adams, R. B., de Haan, J., Terjesen, S., & van Ees, H. (2015). Board diversity: Moving the field forward. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 77–82.
  2. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.
  3. Ajaz, A., Shenbei, Z., & Sarfraz, M. (2020). Delineating the influence of boardroom gender diversity on corporate social responsibility, financial performance and reputation. Logforum, 16(1), 61–74.
  4. Akhmetshin, E., Danchikov, E., Polyanskaya, T., Plaskova, N., Prodanova, N., & Zhiltsov, S. (2018). Analysis of Innovation Activity Of Enterprises In Modern Business Environment. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 8(8).
  5. Al-Matari, E. M., Mgammal, M. H., Alosaimi, M. H., Alruwaili, T. F., & Al-Bogami, S. (2022). Financial technology, Board of Directors and Corporate Performance in Saudi Arabia Financial Sector: Empirical Study. Sustainability, 14(17), 10750.
  6. Aramburu, I. A., & Pescador, I. G. (2019). The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Loyalty: The Mediating Effect of Reputation In Cooperative Banks Versus Commercial Banks In The Basque Country. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(3), 701–719.‐017‐3438‐1
  7. Arnaboldi, F., Casu, B., Gallo, A., Kalotychou, E., & Sarkisyan, A. (2021). Gender Diversity and Bank Misconduct. Journal of Corporate Finance.
  8. Arnaboldi, F., Casu, B., Kalotychou, E., & Sarkisyan, A. (2020). The performance effects of board heterogeneity: What works for EU banks? The European Journal of Finance, 26(10), 897–924.
  9. Bătae, O. M., Dragomir, V. D., & Feleagă, L. (2021). The relationship between environmental, social, and financial performance in the banking sector: A European study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125791.
  10. Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221.
  11. Biduri, S., Maryanti, E., Ahmed, E. R., & Nurasik. (2023). Does Board Gender Diversity Affect Accounting Conservatism and Financial Performance? AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi, 14(2), 203–218.
  12. Birindelli, G., Iannuzzi, A. P., & Savioli, M. (2019). The impact of women leaders on environmental performance: Evidence on gender diversity in banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, csr.1762.
  13. Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(2), 185–197.
  14. Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on Boards of Directors and Corporate Social Performance: A Meta-Analysis: Women Directors and Corporate Social Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428–442.
  15. Cardillo, G., Onali, E., & Torluccio, G. (2021). Does gender diversity on banks’ boards matter? Evidence from public bailouts. Journal of Corporate Finance, 71, 101560.
  16. Cordeiro, J. J., Profumo, G., & Tutore, I. (2020). Board gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of family and dual‐class majority ownership structures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1127–1144.
  17. Creary, S., McDonnell, M. H., Ghai, S., & Scruggs, J. (2019). When and why diversity improves your board’s performance. Harvard Business Review, 27.
  18. Cucari, N., Esposito De Falco, S., & Orlando, B. (2018). Diversity of Board of Directors and Environmental Social Governance: Evidence From Italian Listed Companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(3), 250–266.
  19. Deng, X., Huang, Z., & Cheng, X. (2019). Financial technology and sustainable development: Evidence from China based on P2P data. Sustainability, 11(22).
  20. Dorfleitner, G., & Braun, D. (2019). Financial technology, digitalization and blockchain: Possible applications for green finance. In: The Rise of Green Finance in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 207–237.
  21. European Banking Authority. (2020). EBA calls for measures to ensure a more balanced composition of management bodies in institutions.
  22. Farag, H., & Mallin, C. (2017). Board diversity and financial fragility: Evidence from European banks. International Review of Financial Analysis, 49, 98–112.
  23. Ferramosca, S., & Verona, R. (2020). Framing The Evolution Of Corporate Social Responsibility As A Discipline (1973–2018): A Large-Scale Scientometric Analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 178–203.
  24. Galbreath, J. (2018). Is board gender diversity linked to financial performance? The mediating mechanism of CSR. Business & Society, 57(5).
  25. Galletta, S., Mazzù, S., Naciti, V., & Vermiglio, C. (2021). Gender diversity and sustainability performance in the banking industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 161–174.
  26. Gangi, F., Meles, A., D’Angelo, E., & Daniele, L. M. (2018). Sustainable Development And Corporate Governance In The Financial System: Are Environmentally Friendly Banks Less Risky? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 1–19.
  27. Garcia-Meca, M., Garcia-Sanchez, I. M., & Martinez-Ferrero, J. (2015). Board diversity and its effects on bank performance: An international analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 53, 202–214.
  28. Giannarakis, G., & Theotokas, I. (2011). The Effect of Financial Crisis In Corporate Social Responsibility Performance. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 3(1), 2–10.
  29. Glass, C., Cook, A., & Ingersoll, A. R. (2016). Do women leaders promote sustainability? Analyzing the effect of corporate governance composition on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(7), 495–511.
  30. Gulzar, M. A., Cherian, J., Hwang, J., Jiang, Y., & Sial, M. S. (2019). The impact of board gender diversity and foreign institutional investors on the corporate social responsibility (CSR) engagement of Chinese listed companies. Sustainability, 11(2), 307.
  31. Hollindale, J., Kent, P., Routledge, J., & Chapple, L. (2019). Women On Boards And Greenhouse Gas Emission Disclosures. Accounting and Finance, 59, 277–308.
  32. Huang, D. Z. X. (2019). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) activity and firm performance: A review and consolidation. Account. Financ. Acfi.
  33. Jabari, H. N., & Muhamad, R. (2021). Gender diversity and financial performance of Islamic banks. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 19(3), 412–433.
  34. Jo, H., Kim, H., & Park, K. (2015). Corporate Environmental Responsibility And Firm Performance In The Financial Services Sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(2), 257–284.‐015‐3005‐6
  35. Li, J., Zhao, F., Chen, S., Jiang, W., Liu, T., & Shi, S. (2017). Gender diversity on boards and firms’ environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 306–315.
  36. Lu, J., & Herremans, I. M. (2019). Board Gender Diversity And Environmental Performance: An Industries Perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment.
  37. Luanglath, N., Ali, M., & Mohannak, K. (2019). Top management team gender diversity and productivity: The role of board gender diversity. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 38(1), 71–86.
  38. Luo, S., Sun, Y., & Zhou, R. (2022). Can Financial technology innovation promote household consumption? Evidence from China family panel studies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 82.
  39. Murinde, V., Rizopoulos, E., & Zachariadis, M. (2022). The impact of the Financial technology revolution on the future of banking: Opportunities and risks. International Review of Financial Analysis, 81.
  40. Nadeem, M. (2020). Corporate governance and supplemental environmental projects: A restorative justice approach. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10551-020-04561-x
  41. Nadeem, M., Zaman, R., & Saleem, I. (2017). Boardroom gender diversity and corporate sustainability practices: Evidence from Australian Securities Exchange listed firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 874–885.
  42. Nguyen, T. H. H., Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., & Wu, Y. (2021). Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China. Business Strategy and the Environment.
  43. Nugroho, D. S., Valencia, C., & Aina, R. (2023). Msme Financing and it Investment on Corporate Performance: The Role of Financial technology Adoption. Proceeding Medan International Conference Economics and Business, 1, 645–654.
  44. Owen, A. L., & Temesvary, J. (2018). The performance effects of gender diversity on bank boards. Journal of Banking and Finance, 90, 50–63.
  45. Rao, K. K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board Composition And Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role Of Diversity, Gender, Strategy And Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327–324.
  46. Ren, X., Aujla, G. S., Jindal, A., Batth, R. S., & Zhang, P. (2021). Adaptive recovery mechanism for SDN controllers in Edge-Cloud supported Financial technology applications. IEEE Internet Things J.
  47. Reyes Bastidas, C., & del Briano-Turrent, G. (2018). Las mujeres en posiciones de liderazgo y la sustentabilidad empresarial: Evidencia en empresas cotizadas de Colombia y Chile [Women in leadership positions and corporate sustainability: Evidence on listed companies from Colombia and Chile]. Estudios Gerenciales.
  48. Sahay, R., Cihak, M., N’Diaye, P., Barajas, A., Kyobe, A., Mitra, S., & Yousefi, S. R. (2017). Banking on women leaders: A case for more? (WP/17/199). International Monetary Fund.‐on‐Women‐Leaders‐ACase‐for‐More‐45221
  49. Setò-Pamies, D. (2015). The Relationship Between Women Directors And Corporate Social Responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6), 334–345.
  50. Talavera, O., Yin, S., & Zhang, M. (2018). Age diversity, directors’ personal values, and bank performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 55, 60–79.
  51. Torchia, M., Calabro, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317.
  52. Valls Martinez, M. D. C., Cruz Rambaud, S., & Parra Oller, I. M. (2019). Gender Policies on Board of Directors And Sustainable Development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1539–1553.
  53. Wang, B., Wang, Z., Wen, J., & Zhang, X. T. (2021). Executive gender and firm environmental management: Evidence from CFO transitions. Sustainability, 13(7).
  54. Wibowo, H. H., & Lasdi, L. (2022). Corporate Governance Moderate Effect of Environmental Perfomance and Disclosure on Company Perfomance. AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(2), 227–239.
  55. Yasser, Q. R., Al Mamun, A., & Ahmed, I. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility And Gender Diversity: Insights From Asia Pacific. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(3), 210–221.