Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 485 Download : 353

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Fraudulent behavior includes any unethical or harmful behavior that affects people, organizations, and  environment. The purpose of this study is to examine how internal control, as well as sensitivity and morality can prevent  fraud from occurring. There are four state-owned banks participating in this study. To collect the data, questionnaires were distributed to and completed by 100 workers of state-owned banks. Additionally, this study implemented multiple linear regression analysis as its methodology. The findings of this study demonstrate that internal control has a positive and significant impact on preventing fraud with a t count > t table, specifically 4.239 > 1.66023 with a significance value of 0.000, less than 0.05, and moral sensitivity has a positive and significant impact on preventing fraud with a t count > t table, specifically 1.998 > 1.66023 with a significance value of 0.048, less than 0.05.

Keywords

Fraud Prevention Internal Control Moral Sensitivity

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Ricky, Insani, C., Mahdi, Riani, D., & Bakri, A. A. (2023). Fraud Prevention Through Internal Control and Moral Sensitivity (A Case Study at State-Owned Banks). Ilomata International Journal of Management, 4(3), 340-355. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijjm.v4i3.817

References

  1. Al-Fithrie, N. L. (2015). Pengaruh moral reasoning dan ethical sensitivity terhadap persepsi etis mahasiswa akuntansi dengan gender sebagai variabel moderasi: Vol. Skripsi,(1 (pp. 1–171).
  2. Anggoe, M., & Reskino, R. (2023). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal, Whistleblowing System, Dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Pencegahan Kecurangan Dengan Moralitas Individu Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 10(1), 31–50.
  3. Annafi, G. D., & Yudowati, S. P. (2021). Analisis Financial Distress, Profitabilitas, dan Materialitas Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Kompetif, 4(3), 255–262.
  4. Aranta, P. Z. (2013). Pengaruh moralitas aparat dan asimetri informasi terhadap kecenderungan kecurangan akuntansi (studi empiris pemerintah kota sawahlunto. Jurnal Akuntansi, 1(1).
  5. Arifin, N. F., & Agustami, S. (2016). Pengaruh Likuiditas, Solvabilitas, Profitabilitas, Rasio Pasar, dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Harga Saham (Studi Pada Perusahaan Subsektor Perkebunan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2010-2014. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(3), 1189–1210.
  6. Armelia, P. A., & Wahyuni, M. A. (2020). Pengaruh Kompetensi Aparatur Desa, Efektivitas Pengendalian Internal, dan Moral Sesitivity terhadap Pencegahan Fraud dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa. Vokasi: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 9(2), 61–70.
  7. Badara, M. S., & Saidin, S. Z. (2014). Internal audit effectiveness: Data screening and preliminary analysis. Asian Social Science, 10(10), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n10p76
  8. Beeri, I., Dayan, R., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Werner, S. B. (2013). Advancing Ethics in Public Organizations: The Impact of an Ethics Program on Employees’ Perceptions and Behaviors in a Regional Council. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1232-7
  9. Cressey, D. R. (1950). The criminal violation of financial trust. American Sociological Review, 15(6), 738–743.
  10. Farochi, M. F. F., & Nugroho, A. H. D. (2022). Pengaruh pengendalian internal dan Good Corporate Governance terhadap Pencegahan Kecurangan. Prosiding Akuntansi, 4(2), 861–868.
  11. Fiorino, N., Galli, E., & Padovano, F. (2015). How long does it take for government decentralization to affect corruption? Economics of Governance, 16(3), 273–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-015-0156-y
  12. Hardinto, W., Urumsah, D., Wicaksono, A. P., & Cahaya, F. R. (2020). Sisi gelap pemimpin dalam memotivasi tindakan korupsi. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 11(2), 334–354.
  13. Haryadi, B. (2021). Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dan Upaya Penanganannya Pada Bank Perkreditan Rakyat. InFestasi, 17(2), 143–156.
  14. Irawati, N., Maksum, A., Sadalia, I., & Muda, I. (2019). Financial performance of indonesian’s banking industry: the role of good corporate governance, capital adequacy ratio, non performing loan and size. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(4), 22–26.
  15. Kartadjumena, E., & Indriyati, N. (2021). Pengaruh Moderasi Kesadaran Anti Kecurangan dan Moralitas pada Hubungan Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah dengan Pencegahan Kecurangan di Balai Besar Kementerian Perindustrian Kota Bandung. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Mercu Buana, 7(1), 25–35.
  16. Kassem, R., & Higson, A. (2012). The new fraud triangle model. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(3), 191–195.
  17. Kumar, K., Bhattacharya, S., & Hicks, R. (2018). Employee perceptions of organization culture with respect to fraud–where to look and what to look for. Pacific Accounting Review, 30(2), 187–198.
  18. Kuntadi, C., Meilani, A., & Velayati, E. (2023). Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Pengendalian Internal, Kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia, dan Moralitas Individu Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informasi, 4(4), 651–662.
  19. Lai, Y.-B. (2016). Does Tax Competition Reduce Corruption? Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 63(4), 331–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjpe.12096
  20. Mahrani, M., & Soewarno, N. (2018). The effect of good corporate governance mechanism and corporate social responsibility on financial performance with earnings management as mediating variable. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 3(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-06-2018-0008
  21. Mansor, N., & Abdullahi, R. (2015). Fraud triangle theory and fraud diamond theory. Understanding the convergent and divergent for future research. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Science, 1(4), 38–45.
  22. Maruta, H. (2016). Pengendalian Internal Dalam Sistem Informasi Akuntansi. IQTISHADUNA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Kita, 5(1), 16–28.
  23. Nguyen, H. T., Vo, T. H. N., Le, D. D. M., & Nguyen, V. T. (2020). Fiscal Decentralization, Corruption, and Income Inequality: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), 529–540. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.529
  24. Nisak, C., & Kurniawan, F. A. (2013). Sistem pengendalian intern dalam pencegahan fraud pada satuan kerja perangkat daerah (SKPD) pada kabupaten bangkalan. Journal of Auditing, Finance, and Forensic Accounting, 1(1), 15–22.
  25. Nuryadi, A. M. (2023). Young farmer empowerment model based on freshwater fishery business in Southeast Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. AACL Bioflux, 16(2), 970–978. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85161406781&partnerID=40&md5=15515b6be21ff5fcce23fb188ab38200
  26. Rahmatika, D. N. (2020). Fraud Auditing Kajian Teoretis dan Empiris. Deepublish.
  27. Rahmawati, N., & Kassim, A. A. M. (2020). Fraud Triangle Theory and Accounting Irregularities. Selangor Business Review, 55–64.
  28. Rustendi, T. (2018). Pengaruh Fungsi Audit Internal Terhadap Pelaksanaan Good Governance (survey pada kantor cabang bank umum di tasikmalaya. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen, 4(2), 82–95.
  29. Salsabila, N. T., & Kuntadi, C. (2022). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal, Good Corporate Governance, Dan Moralitas Individu Terhadap Pencegahan Kecurangan. Journal of Comprehensive Science (JCS, 1(4), 612–616.
  30. Sarwoko, I., & Agoes, S. (2014). An empirical analysis of auditor’s industry specialization, auditor’s independence and audit procedures on audit quality: evidence from indonesia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 271–281.
  31. Savalena, M. S. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen dengan Model Four Levers of Control di Terhadap Kinerja Organisasi di PT. Multimas Nabati Asahan (MNA.
  32. Stark, J., Reif, J. A. M., & Schiebler, T. (2022). What leaders tell and employees hear – an intention-perception model of storytelling in leadership. Organization Management Journal, 19(2), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/OMJ-02-2021-1156
  33. Sutaryo, S., Sahari, S. B., Jakpar, S. B., & Balia, S. S. B. (2022). INTERNAL AUDIT FUNCTION AND PUBLIC SERVICE QUALITY: EVIDENCE FROM INDONESIAN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. Public Administration Issues, 5, 110–133. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2022-0-5-110-133
  34. Wahyuni, W., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2017). Fraud triangle sebagai pendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi, 21(1), 47–61.
  35. Widuri, R., Wijaya, W., Effendi, J., & Cikita, E. (2019). The Effect of Good Corporate Governance on Tax Avoidance of Listed Companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2017. Journal of Economics and Business, 2(1), 120–126.
  36. Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud.
  37. Wonar, K., Falah, S., & Pangayow, B. J. (2018). Pengaruh kompetensi aparatur desa, ketaatan pelaporan keuangan dan sistem pengendalian intern terhadap pencegahan fraud dengan moral sensitivity sebagai variabel moderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi, Audit, Dan Aset, 1(2), 63–89.