Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to encourage ownership, responsibility and to develop stakeholders and policy makers for the river normalization program in the pre-construction, construction and post-construction stages. The use of the IPA method to measure community satisfaction in the quadrants on the Importance Performance Matrix map. The results of the study showed that the socialization from the Department of Water and Public Works, when the project was finished, was not in line with community expectations. Flood control projects that have been built, coordination with the contractor at the time of project implementation, socialization from the city government prior to project implementation, socialization from the city government when the project is finished, socialization from the river hall at the time before project implementation, socialization from the river hall at the time the project was completed, dissemination of information from the irrigation service prior to project implementation, and community involvement in project implementation. The process of land clearing, and the price agreement that has been reached. Improved land clearing, and price agreements that have been reached can be reconsidered because their impact on the benefits felt by the community is very small.

Keywords

Importance Performance Analysis, Community Satisfaction, Urban Flood Control

Article Details

References

  1. Asrofi, A., Hardoyo, S. R., & Sri Hadmoko, D. (2017). Strategi Adaptasi Masyarakat Pesisir Dalam Penanganan Bencana Banjir Rob Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Ketahanan Wilayah (Studi Di Desa Bedono Kecamatan Sayung Kabupaten Demak Jawa Tengah). Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional, 23(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkn.26257
  2. Bindu, T., & Kanagaraj, D. C. (2013). Importance - Performance Analysis as a Strategic Tool for Destination Attractiveness : an Analysis of Domestic Travelers To Kerala. International Journal of Management & Business Studies, 3(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/2230-9519
  3. Carter, W. N. (2008). Disaster Management A Disaster Manager’s Handbook. In Asian Development Bank.
  4. Crompton, J. L., & Duray, N. A. (1985). An investigation of the relative efficacy of four alternative approaches to importance-performance analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02737200
  5. Kodoatie, R. J., & Sugiyanto. (2002). Banjir, Beberapa Penyebab dan Pengendaliannya dalam Perspektif Lingkungan. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npg.2013.07.003
  6. Nurjanah, Sugiharto, R., K, D., B.P, S., & Adikoesoemo. (2011). Manajemen Bencana. In Alfabeta.
  7. Rezha, F., Rochmah, S., & Siswidiyanto. (2009). Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Terhadap Kepuasan Masyarakat (Studi tentang Pelayanan Perekaman Kartu Tanda Penduduk Elektronik (e-KTP) di Kota Depok). Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 1(5), 981–990. Retrieved from http://administrasipublik.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jap/article/view/116/129
  8. Sasanto, R., Khair, A. S., Kunci, K., Kebijakan, :, Squatters, P., Kembali, B., & Ilegal, K. (2010). Analisis Kebijakan Pemerintah Dalam Penanganan Permukiman Ilegal Di Bantaran Sungai Studi Kasus: Bantaran Kali Pesanggrahan Kampung Baru, Kedoya Utara, Kebon Jeruk. Jurnal Planesa, 1(2), 146–152. Retrieved from https://ejurnal.esaunggul.ac.id/index.php/planesa/article/view/525/487
  9. Sofyan, M. (2016). Analisa Kepuasan Masyarakat Kota Dan Kabupaten Mojokerto Terhadap Proyek Pengendalian Banjir Perkotaan Dengan Metode Importance Performance Analysis. 13(2), 320–329. Retrieved from https://jurnal.ibmt.ac.id/index.php/jeksekutif/article/view/121/pdf
  10. Suleman, S. A., & Apsari, N. C. (2017). Peran Stakeholder Dalam Manajemen Bencana Banjir. Prosiding Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 53–59. https://doi.org/10.24198/jppm.v4i1.14210