Main Article Content

Abstract

School Operational Assistance (SOA) Fund is one of the educational funds in Indonesia. Based on the APBN Financial Note, the management of the SOA fund is still not optimal, and there are still many misuses of the SOA fund by various parties. Therefore, it is necessary to apply the good governance principles in the management of the SOA fund. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the management of the SOA fund, which is influenced by good governance, namely transparency, accountability, participation, and responsibility. The object of this study is the management of the SOA fund at the level of state basic education in Demak Regency, which consists of State Elementary Schools and State Junior High Schools. The data source of this research is primary data using a questionnaire. There are 494 respondents in this research. The respondents are headmasters, school treasurers, teachers, and other parties in school. The study results show that the SOA fund at the level of state basic education in Demak Regency has been managed effectively. The study results also show that all independent variables simultaneously have a positive effect on the effectiveness of the management of the SOA fund. Partially, transparency does not affect the effectiveness of SOA fund management, while accountability, participation, and responsibility have a positive effect on the effectiveness of the management of SOA fund.

Keywords

accountability effectiveness good governance participation responsibility SOA fund transparency

Article Details

How to Cite
Wijayanto, T. P., Sulaeman, A. S., & Nugraha, R. (2022). Shedding Light on the Management of School Operational Assistance (SOA) Fund Effectiveness: a Case Study of State Basic Education Level in Demak Regency. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 3(2), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v3i2.452

References

  1. Anggraini, R. D. (2013). Transparansi, Partisipasi, dan Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Anggaran Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) Dalam Program Rencana Kegiatan dan Anggaran Sekolah (RKAS) di SDN Pacarkeling VIII Surabaya. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik Unair, 1(2), 201–208. http://journal.unair.ac.id/KMP@transparansi,-partisipasi,-dan-akuntabilitas-pengelolaan-anggaran-dana-bos-dalam-program-rkas-di-sdn-pacarkeling-viii-surabaya-article-9273-media-138-category-8.html
  2. Assegaf, F. A. (2014). Implementasi Permendiknas No. 48 Tahun 2008 tentang Pendanaan Pendidikan bagi Siswa Berprestasi dan Kurang Mampu. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 2(2), 113–119. https://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jkpp/article/download/1907/2012/4515
  3. Aziz, N. L. L. (2016). Otonomi Desa dan Efektivitas Dana Desa. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 13(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v13i2.575
  4. Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2014). ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002
  5. Bappenas. (2007). Penerapan Tata Kepemerintahan yang Baik (p. 45). Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan. https://perpustakaan.kpk.go.id/index.php?h=show_detail&id=4180
  6. Bhawa, G. A. S., Haris, I. A., & Artana, M. (2014). Efektivitas Pengelolaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) Pada Sekolah Dasar di Kecamatan Sukasada. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Undiksha, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpe.v4i1.4118
  7. Budiardjo, M. (2018). Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik (10th ed.). Gramedia Pustaka Utama. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=345467
  8. Coryanata, I. (2016). Akuntabilitas, Partisipasi Masyarakat dan Transparansi Kebijakan Publik Sebagai Pemoderasi Hubungan Pengetahuan Dewan Tentang Anggaran Dan Pengawasan Keuangan Daerah. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 12(2), 110–125. https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai/article/view/678
  9. Deighton‐Smith, R. (2004). Regulatory Transparency in OECD Countries: Overview, Trends and Challenges. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2004.00360.x
  10. Fauzan. (2014). Pengaruh Penerapan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Perilaku Etis Dalam pengelolaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah. Jurnal Ekonomi MODERNISASI, 10(3), 158. https://doi.org/10.21067/jem.v10i3.776
  11. Fauziyyah, N. A., Mulyani, H., & Purnamasari, I. (2018). Analisis Efektivitas Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Negeri (SMKN) Kota Bandung. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN AKUNTANSI & KEUANGAN, 6(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpak.v6i1.15828
  12. Fitri, A. (2014). Pengelolaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) Sekolah Dasar Negeri Kecamatan Mandiangin Koto Selayan Kota Bukittinggi. BAHANA: Jurusan Administrasi Manajemen Pendidikan, 2(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24036/bmp.v2i1.3753
  13. Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete dengan Program IBM SPSS 23 (I. Ghozali (ed.); 8th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. http://kin.perpusnas.go.id/DisplayData.aspx?pId=218217&pRegionCode=UN11MAR&pClientId=112
  14. Hamirul, & Apriana, D. (2019). Pemanfaatan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) Dalam Memperbaiki Proses Pembelajaran. JMKSP (Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, Dan Supervisi Pendidikan), 4(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.31851/jmksp.v4i1.2475
  15. Hauge, A. M. (2018). Situated valuations: Affordances of management technologies in organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34(3), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.06.001
  16. Hidayat, R., Burhan, M. R., & Al Ma’ruf, A. M. (2019). Efektivitas Pengelolaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) Dalam Meningkatkan Sarana Dan Prasarana Pendidikan (Studi di SDN 44 Mande Kota Bima). JIAP (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik), 7(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.31764/jiap.v7i2.1269
  17. Indonesia Corruption Watch. (2011). Skandal Dana BOS. Pengelolaan Dana BOS. https://antikorupsi.org/id/article/skandal-dana-bos
  18. Jannah, K. N. (2016). Evaluasi Efektivitas Penggunaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Bidang Keahlian Bisnis dan Manajemen di Kabupaten Sleman Tahun 2014. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v14i1.11362
  19. Kaihatu, T. S. (2006). Good Corporate Governance dan Penerapannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 8(1), 1–9. https://jurnalmanajemen.petra.ac.id/index.php/man/article/view/16505/16497
  20. Keban, Y. T. (2008). Enam Dimensi Strategis Administrasi Publik: Konsep, Teori dan Isu (3rd ed.). Gava Media. https://onesearch.id/Record/IOS7783.ai:slims-6456
  21. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 1 Tahun 2018 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (p. 136). Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. https://bos.kemdikbud.go.id/media/upload/users/5610fb71841ca54bd90ef3be/files/Permendikbud Nomor 1 Tahun 2018.pdf
  22. Krina, L. L. (2003). Indikator dan Alat Ukur Prinsip Akuntabilitas, Transparansi & Partisipasi (p. 25). Sekretariat Good Public Governance Bappenas. https://docplayer.info/125452-Indikator-alat-ukur-prinsip-akuntabilitas-transparansi-partisipasi-disusun-oleh-dra-loina-lalolo-krina-p.html
  23. Lipoff, J. B., & Grant-Kels, J. M. (2013). Should dermatology residents accept educational support sponsored or funded by pharmaceutical companies? Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 68(5), 854–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2012.10.025
  24. Mardiasmo. (2006). Perwujudan Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Publik Melalui Akuntansi Sektor Publik: Suatu Sarana Good Governance. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah, 2(1), 1–17. http://opac.lib.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=book_detail&sub=BookDetail&act=view&typ=htmlext&buku_id=753019&unit_id=200
  25. Marliani, L. (2019). Definition of Administration in Different Perspectives. Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 5(4), 17–21. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/228850661.pdf
  26. Matei, A., & Drumasu, C. (2015). Corporate Governance and Public Sector Entities. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00879-5
  27. Monks, R., & Minow, N. (1996). Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 51(2), 774. https://doi.org/10.2307/2329384
  28. National Committee on Governance Policy. (2006). General Guidelines for Good Public Governance in Indonesia. (p. 39). Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance. https://ecgi.global/download/file/fid/9660
  29. Noels, J. (2018). What Is SPSS and its Important in Research & Data Analysis. Medium. https://johnnoels.medium.com/what-is-spss-and-its-importance-in-research-data-analysis-5f109ab90da1#:~:text=SPSS (Statistical package for the,surveys%2C data mining%2C etc.
  30. Novatiani, R. A., & Lestari, N. (2014). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Publik, Partisipasi Masyarakat dan Transparasi Kebijakan Publik Terhadap Pengawasan Keuangan Daerah (APBD) di DPRD Kota Bandung. Jurusan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Widyatama, 2(1), 1–20. https://adoc.pub/oleh-r-ait-novatiani-dan-nurmalita-lestari-jurusan-akuntansi.html
  31. Nurhidayah, M., & Sarsiti. (2017). Analisis Penerapan Good Corporate Governance Pada Pengelolaan Dana BOS di Pesantren Bilingual SMP Negeri Sragen. Jurnal Pendidikan Smoothing, 15(1), 34–39.
  32. Nurjana, W. I. (2018). Pengaruh Penerapan Good School Governance Terhadap Efektivitas Pengelolaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah [University of Muhammadiyah Malang]. https://eprints.umm.ac.id/36362/
  33. Nursaptini, N., & Suyanto, S. (2019). Dampak Bantuan Operasional Sekolah di MTs Nurul Yaqin Praya dan MTs Al-Ittihadiyah NW Sepakat. Harmoni Sosial: Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 6(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.21831/hsjpi.v6i2.9845
  34. Pambudi, A. S., Deni, Hidayati, S., Putri, D. A. C., & Wibowo, A. D. C. (2021). Special Allocation Fund (DAK) For Education Sector : A Development Evaluation Perspective Of Fiscal YEAR 2019. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 29(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.14203/JEP.29.1.2021.41-58
  35. Raeni. (2014). Pengaruh Prinsip Keadilan, Efisiensi, Transparansi, dan Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Keuangan Terhadap Produktivitas SMK. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 3(1), 143–151. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eeaj/article/view/4228
  36. Rahayu, S., Ludigdo, U., Irianto, G., & Nurkholis. (2015). Budgeting of School Operational Assistance Fund Based on The Value of Gotong Royong. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.047
  37. Rahmatulloh Savitri, E., Gumanti, T. A., Andreas, A., & Diyanto, V. (2018). The Effectiveness of Allocated Village Funds Management (A Study in Pelalawan District, Riau Province, Indonesia). Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 16(4), 722–730. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2018.016.04.19
  38. Shahab, S., Clinch, J. P., & O’Neill, E. (2018). Accounting for transaction costs in planning policy evaluation. Land Use Policy, 70, 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.028
  39. Siagian, S. P. (2012). Organisasi, Kepemimpinan dan Perilaku Administrasi (6th ed.). Gunung Agung. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=94719
  40. Solomon, J. (2020). Corporate Governance and Accountability (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Corporate+Governance+and+Accountability%2C+5th+Edition-p-9781119561200
  41. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (I). Alfabeta. https://cvalfabeta.com/product/metode-penelitian-kuantitatif-kualitatif-dan-rd-mpkk/
  42. Sumarni, S. (2014). Efektivitas Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah Terhadap Peningkatan Mutu di Madrasah. EDUKASI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama Dan Keagamaan, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v12i1.75
  43. USAID. (2014). Public Service Oriented School-Based Management. https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00MKSN.pdf
  44. Utama, D. A., & Setiyani, R. (2014). Pengaruh Transparansi, Akuntabilitas, dan Responsibilitas Pengelolaan Keuangan Sekolah Terhadap Kinerja Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Dinamika Pendidikan, 9(2), 100–114. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/DP/article/view/4886/4029
  45. Wahyudi, D. (2014). Dampak Penerapan Good Corporate Governance terhadap Kepatuhan Pajak Badan (p. 30). BPPK Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. https://bppk.kemenkeu.go.id/id/publikasi/artikel/167-artikel-pajak/19453-dampak-penerapan-good-corporate-governance-terhadap-kepatuhan-pajak-perusahaan