Regional Fiscal Policy and Provincial Fiscal Performance in Indonesia: The Dual Moderating Role of Fiscal Decentralization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61194/ijtc.v7i3.2353Keywords:
Fiscal decentralization, Regional fiscal policy, Development expenditure, Public financial management, Indonesia regional governanceAbstract
Fiscal decentralization has been widely implemented to improve regional fiscal efficiency and strengthen local fiscal capacity. However, empirical evidence regarding its effectiveness remains inconclusive, particularly in developing countries with diverse institutional capacities. This study examines the associations between regional fiscal policy instruments and provincial fiscal performance in Indonesia, proxied by the growth of Locally Generated Revenue (PAD), while investigating the moderating role of fiscal decentralization. Unlike previous studies that examine fiscal instruments separately or focus mainly on macroeconomic outcomes, this research develops an integrated framework that evaluates financing allocation, development expenditure, transfer funds, and other legitimate revenues within a moderated panel-data model. Using panel data from 33 provincial governments during 2017–2024, the study applies a fixed-effects regression model with interaction terms. The results show that development expenditure is positively and significantly associated with provincial fiscal performance, indicating that productive public spending strengthens regional fiscal capacity. In contrast, financing allocation and transfer funds show no significant direct associations with fiscal performance. Other legitimate revenues demonstrate a positive but limited association. Fiscal decentralization plays a dual moderating role by strengthening the association between transfer funds and fiscal performance while weakening the effects of development expenditure and other legitimate revenues. These findings suggest that the effectiveness of fiscal decentralization depends on fiscal instruments and local institutional capacity rather than producing uniform outcomes. This study contributes to the fiscal decentralization literature by providing an interaction-based empirical framework and practical evidence to support more effective decentralization policies and improve provincial fiscal performance in Indonesia.
References
Agrawal, D. R., Brueckner, J. K., & Brülhart, M. (2024). Fiscal Federalism in the Twenty-First Century. In Annual Review of Economics (Vol. 16, Number 1). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081623-020713
Aritenang, A. F., & Chandramidi, A. N. (2023). The spatial effects of fiscal decentralization on regional convergence: the case of regions in indonesia. GeoJournal, 88(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10724-2
Armawaddin, M., Rumbia, W. A., & Ahmad, A. (2022). The Effect of Fiscal Decentralization on Economic Development Performance in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Studi Pembangunan, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.17977/um002v14i22022p171
Bahl, R., & Bird, R. (2018). Fiscal decentralization and local finance in developing countries. Public Budgeting and Finance, 38(3), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12180
Barro, R. (2019). Government spending and economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 24(2), 145–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-019-09161-3
Creswell, J. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Diem, L. T. T., & Hart, N. (2024). Fiscal decentralization and income convergence: evidence from Vietnam. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 29(3), 1513–1532. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2022.2108211
Digdowiseiso, K., Sugiyanto, E., & Setiawan, H. D. (2020). Fiscal decentralisation and inequality in Indonesia. Economy of Regions, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2020-3-24
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1), 49–64.
Fang, Z., Li, Z., & Tao, S. (2022). Environmental Information Disclosure, Fiscal Decentralization, and Exports: Evidence From China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.813786
Hasanah, N., & Syah, E. (2025). Desentralisasi dan Tantangan Otonomi Daerah: Analisis Kebijakan dengan Pendekatan Mixed-Method. Perkara : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.51903/perkara.v3i1.2333
Ida Bagus Agung Haridharma Purba. (2025). Literature review on local government financial performance measurement. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.1.4054
Meckling, W. H., & Jensen, M. C. (1976). Theory of the Firm. Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, 3(4), 305–360.
Mohammed, A. S., Tuokuu, F. X., & Bokuma, A. (2025). Decentralization and Local Government Performance: Empirical Evidence From Ghana. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 60(5), 3219–3239. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096241228777
Nguyen, T., & Anwar, S. (2022). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 82, 101155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101155
Oates, W. (2017). Central and Local Government Relations in Asia (N. Yoshino & P. J. Morgan, Eds.). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786436870
Onofrei, M., Oprea, F., Iaţu, C., Cojocariu, L., & Anton, S. G. (2022). Fiscal Decentralization, Good Governance and Regional Development—Empirical Evidence in the European Context. Sustainability, 14(12), 7093. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127093
Putri, R. A., & Handayani, N. (2022). Regional original revenue and local government financial performance. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 19(1), 35–54.
Qi, L., & Gong, H. (2025). Local government performance: promoting trust in local government and reducing trust gap. Local Government Studies, 51(4), 726–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2024.2424810
Reddy, Y. V, Reddy, G. R., & Chakraborty, P. (2025). Evolution of Fiscal Federalism. In Indian Fiscal Federalism. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198971658.003.0003
Sasana, H. (2020). Government expenditure and economic growth in Indonesian regions. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 21(2), 89–102.
Shu, Z., & Ju, S. (2026). How does China’s local fiscal decentralization promote common prosperity? An analysis of the mediating role of rural revitalization. Economics of Governance, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-026-00349-3
Song, Y., Ma, J., Guan, S., & Liu, Y. (2022). Fiscal Decentralization, Regional Innovation and Industrial Structure Distortions in China. Sustainability, 15(1), 710. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010710
Tifanny. (2025). Flypaper Effect pada Pendapatan Asli Daerah (PAD), Dana Alokasi Umum (DAU), Dana Alokasi Khusus (DAK) terhadap Belanja Daerah Kabupaten/Kota di kalimantan Barat. Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi UNTAN (KIAFE) 2025, 3(2).
Treisman, D. (2006). Fiscal Decentralization, Governance, And Economic Performance: A Reconsideration. Economics & Politics, 18(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2006.00169.x
Tuti Dharmawati, Wa Ode Muhardiana, & Wa Ode Aprisilia Z.A. (2024). The Role of Fiscal Decentralization in Enhancing Regional Financial Independence in Indonesia. Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research, 2(12). https://doi.org/10.62504/jimr1107
Wang, Y., Shen, W., & Xu, J. (2024). Fiscal decentralization and the transformation of regional energy structures in China: Spatial spillover effects and the mediating role of technological innovation. Heliyon, 10(17), e36667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36667
Wang, Z., Liu, Y., & Zhang, J. (2024). Fiscal decentralization and local government performance. Economic Systems, 48(1), 101068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101068
Wei, T., Chen, M., Wang, F., & Cheng, S. (2024). The impact of public demands on local environmental governance performance: Evidence from civil environmental complaints placed on leaders at different government levels in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 360, 121216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121216
Wooldridge, J. M. (2025). Two-way fixed effects, the two-way mundlak regression, and difference-in-differences estimators. Empirical Economics, 69(5), 2545–2587.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Niko Silitonga, Harya Widiputra, Fangky Antoneus Sorongan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
