Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 107 Download : 99

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to identify the nexus between social, environmental, legal, governance dimensions and the economic development in order to achieve SDGS in Indonesia.   The research uses quantitative methods with the primary data in the form of the SDGS Achievement indicators obtained from the 2015 to 2022 Indonesia National Planning Agency and Central Bureau of Statistics. The data analysis techniques are SEM-PLS bootstrapping, with confidence interval of 5%. The results showed that social, environmental, legal and governance development have a positive influence on economic development  towards the achievement of the Sustainable Development goals.  All the results of the t-test exceed 1.96,  the P Values, which denote the level of significance required, are below 0.05, and the adjusted  R Square  has the value of 0.888 (88.8%), which suggests that its capability to clarify the correlation between social, environmental, law, governance and the economic development variable is robust, with an 88.8% level of accuracy. The implication of this research that economic growth has brought about many benefits for Indonesia, also proved to have significant impacts on various aspects of society, including the environment, social structures, law, and governance.  It is critical to note that policymakers and stakeholders work together to address these challenges and to ensure that the development is sustainable and equitable for all Indonesians.

Keywords

Economic Social Environmental Law and Governance Sustainable Development SDGS

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

Purboyo, Islamic University of Kalimantan

Management

Farida Yulianti, Islamic University of Kalimantan

Management

Lamsah, Islamic University of Kalimantan

Management

Aida Vitria, Islamic University of Kalimantan

Management

How to Cite
Zulfikar, R., Purboyo, Yulianti, F., Lamsah, & Vitria, A. (2023). The Nexus between Social, Environmental, Law, Governance Dimensions and Economic Development for Indonesian’s SDGs Achievement . Ilomata International Journal of Management, 4(3), 303-317. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijjm.v4i3.754

References

  1. Ahmad, M., Jiang, P., Murshed, M., Shehzad, K., Akram, R., Cui, L., & Khan, Z. (2021). Modelling the dynamic linkages between eco-innovation, urbanization, economic growth and ecological footprints for G7 countries: does financial globalization matter? Sustainable Cities and Society, 70, 102881.
  2. Amar, S., & Pratama, I. (2020). Exploring the link between income inequality, poverty reduction and economic growth: An ASEAN perspective. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(2), 24–41.
  3. Dalevska, N., Khobta, V., Kwilinski, A., & Kravchenko, S. (2019). A model for estimating social and economic indicators of sustainable development. Entrepreneurship and sustainability issues, 6(4), 1839.
  4. Dantas, T. E. T., de-Souza, E. D., Destro, I. R., Hammes, G., Rodriguez, C. M. T., & Soares, S. R. (2021). How the combination of Circular Economy and Industry 4.0 can contribute towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 213–227.
  5. Ergashev, I., & Farxodjonova, N. (2020). Integration of national culture in the process of globalization. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(2), 477.
  6. Fonseca, L. M., Domingues, J. P., & Dima, A. M. (2020). Mapping the sustainable development goals relationships. Sustainability, 12(8), 3359.
  7. Harangozo, G., Csutora, M., & Kocsis, T. (2018). How big is big enough? Toward a sustainable future by examining alternatives to the conventional economic growth paradigm. Sustainable Development, 26(2), 172–181.
  8. Hirons, M. (2020). How the Sustainable Development Goals risk undermining efforts to address environmental and social issues in the small-scale mining sector. Environmental Science & Policy, 114, 321–328.
  9. Hysa, E., Kruja, A., Rehman, N. U., & Laurenti, R. (2020). Circular economy innovation and environmental sustainability impact on economic growth: An integrated model for sustainable development. Sustainability, 12(12), 4831.
  10. Khan, S. A. R., Sharif, A., Golpîra, H., & Kumar, A. (2019). A green ideology in Asian emerging economies: From environmental policy and sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 27(6), 1063–1075.
  11. Lamba, J., Gupta, B., & Dzever, S. (2020). Global crisis of sustainable development and global warming: a case analysis of Indonesia and Laos. Sustainable Development and Energy Transition in Europe and Asia, 9, 129–144.
  12. Lee, S. (2020). Role of social and solidarity economy in localizing the sustainable development goals. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 27(1), 65–71.
  13. Luna-Nemecio, J., Tobón, S., & Juárez-Hernández, L. G. (2020). Sustainability-based on socioformation and complex thought or sustainable social development. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 2, 100007.
  14. Mc Lennan, A., & Ngoma, W. Y. (2004). Quality governance for sustainable development? Progress in Development Studies, 4(4), 279–293.
  15. Murshed, M., Rahman, M. A., Alam, M. S., Ahmad, P., & Dagar, V. (2021). The nexus between environmental regulations, economic growth, and environmental sustainability: linking environmental patents to ecological footprint reduction in South Asia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(36), 49967–49988.
  16. Ndubisi, N. O., Zhai, X. A., & Lai, K. H. (2021). Small and medium manufacturing enterprises and Asia’s sustainable economic development. International Journal of Production Economics, 233, 107971.
  17. Palazzo, M., Gigauri, I., Panait, M. C., Apostu, S. A., & Siano, A. (2022). Sustainable Tourism Issues in European Countries during the Global Pandemic Crisis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073844
  18. Pecl, G. T., Araújo, M. B., Bell, J. D., Blanchard, J., Bonebrake, T. C., Chen, I. C., & Williams, S. E. (2017). Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science, 355(6332), 9214.
  19. Prasetyo, P. E., & Kistanti, N. R. (2020). Human capital, institutional economics and entrepreneurship as a driver for quality & sustainable economic growth. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(4), 2575.
  20. Raco, M. (2005). Sustainable development, rolled‐out neoliberalism and sustainable communities. Antipode, 37(2), 324–347.
  21. Rahmani, T., & Mirzadeh Koohshahi, N. (2013). Relationship between the Rule of Law, Good Governance, and Sustainable Development. International Journal of Political Science, 3(2), 10–22.
  22. Roy, C. K., & Xiaoling, H. (2022). Achieving SDG 5, gender equality and empower all women and girls, in developing countries: how aid for trade can help? International Journal of Social Economics.
  23. Scherer, A. G., & Voegtlin, C. (2020). Corporate governance for responsible innovation: Approaches to corporate governance and their implications for sustainable development. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(2), 182–208.
  24. Sioson, E. P. (2017). Uneven Integration: Local Government Integration Policies and Filipino Residents in Nagoya City, Japan. Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, 4(3), 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.190
  25. Smith, P., & Hart. (2022). The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart, Eds.). John Wiley & Sons.
  26. Syahza, A., Bakce, D., Nasrul, B., & Irianti, M. (2020). Peatland policy and management strategy to support sustainable development in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1655(1), 12151.
  27. Vries, B. J., & Petersen, A. C. (2009). Conceptualizing sustainable development: An assessment methodology connecting values, knowledge, worldviews and scenarios. Ecological Economics, 68(4), 1006–1019.
  28. Warner, K. (2010). Global environmental change and migration: Governance challenges. Global environmental change, 20(3), 402–413.
  29. Xavier, L. H., Ottoni, M., & Lepawsky, J. (2021). Circular economy and e-waste management in the Americas: Brazilian and Canadian frameworks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126570
  30. Zhang, L., Xu, M., Chen, H., Li, Y., & Chen, S. (2022). Globalization, green economy and environmental challenges: state of the art review for practical implications. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 199.