Main Article Content


This study aims to determine the effect of managerial ownership, institutional ownership and investment decisions on dividend policy with liquidity as an intervening variable in LQ45 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the period 2018-2021. This study uses the causal associative method. This population is 45 companies using purposive sampling method . This research was conducted in LQ45 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the period 2018-2021. The type of data used in this study is secondary data and analyzed using SPSS 25. The analysis technique in this study uses regression analysis and path analysis.The results of the analysis show that managerial ownership, institutional ownership and investment decisions partially affect dividend policy. Indirectly, liquidity can intervene in managerial ownership and also institutional ownership on dividend policy, while liquidity cannot intervene in investment decisions on dividend policy.


Managerial Ownership Institutional Ownership Investment Decisions Liquidity Dividend Policy

Article Details

How to Cite
Sunaryo, D. (2022). Importance of Liquidity Indicators in Intervening the Dividend Policy. Ilomata International Journal of Tax and Accounting, 3(3), 272-289.


  1. Afriani, F., Savitri, E., & Aprilia, R. (2013). Pengaruh Likuiditas, Leverage, Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan dan Growth Terhadap Kebijakan Dividen. Jurnal Manajemen STIE MDP, 3(1), 1–13.
  2. Akindayomi, A., & Amin, M. R. (2022). Does business strategy affect dividend payout policies? Journal of Business Research, 151, 531–550.
  3. Aksoy, M., Yilmaz, M. K., Tatoglu, E., & Basar, M. (2020). Antecedents of corporate sustainability performance in Turkey: The effects of ownership structure and board attributes on non-financial companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124284.
  4. Alhazaimeh, A., Palaniappan, R., & Almsafir, M. (2014). The Impact of Corporate Governance and Ownership Structure on Voluntary Disclosure in Annual Reports among Listed Jordanian Companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 341–348.
  5. Ali, H., & Hegazy, A. Y. (2022). Dividend policy, risk and the cross-section of stock returns: Evidence from India. International Review of Economics & Finance, 79, 169–192.
  6. Barros, V., Guedes, M. J., Santos, P., & Sarmento, J. M. (2022). Does CEO turnover influence dividend policy? Finance Research Letters, 44, 102085.
  7. Barros, V., Verga Matos, P., Miranda Sarmento, J., & Rino Vieira, P. (2021). Do activist shareholders influence a manager’s decisions on a firm’s dividend policy: A mixed-method study. Journal of Business Research, 122, 387–397.
  8. Basuki, A. T., & Prawoto, N. (2019). Analisis Regresi dalam Penelitian Ekonomi dan Bisnis (A. T. Basuki (ed.); 3rd ed.). RajaGrafindo Persada.
  9. Berrospide, J. M., & Herrerias, R. (2015). Finance companies in Mexico: Unexpected victims of the global liquidity crunch. Journal of Financial Stability, 18, 33–54.
  10. Cao, Z., Chen, S. X., Harakeh, M., & Lee, E. (2022). Do non-financial factors influence corporate dividend policies? Evidence from business strategy. International Review of Financial Analysis, 82, 102211.
  11. Chen, C.-J., Ruey-Shan Guo, Wang, S.-H., & Lin, Y.-H. (2022). Power distance diversification, ownership structure, and business group performance. Journal of Business Research, 151, 70–85.
  12. Cruz, A. M., & Haugan, G. L. (2019). Determinants of maintenance performance: A resource-based view and agency theory approach. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 51, 33–47.
  13. Cui, Y., Zhang, Y., Guo, J., Hu, H., & Meng, H. (2019). Top management team knowledge heterogeneity, ownership structure and financial performance: Evidence from Chinese IT listed companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 14–21.
  14. Fabisik, K., Fahlenbrach, R., Stulz, R. M., & Taillard, J. P. (2021). Why are firms with more managerial ownership worth less? Journal of Financial Economics, 140(3), 699–725.
  15. Fan, Y., Zhang, F., & Zhu, L. (2021). Do family firms invest more in pollution prevention strategy than non-family firms? An integration of agency and institutional theories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 124988.
  16. Fernández-Portillo, A., Almodóvar-González, M., Sánchez-Escobedo, M. C., & Coca-Pérez, J. L. (2022). The role of innovation in the relationship between digitalisation and economic and financial performance. A company-level research. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(3), 100190.
  17. Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete dengan Program IBM SPSS 23 (I. Ghozali (ed.); 8th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  18. Gilje, E. P., Gormley, T. A., & Levit, D. (2020). Who’s paying attention? Measuring common ownership and its impact on managerial incentives. Journal of Financial Economics, 137(1), 152–178.
  19. Grassetti, F., Mammana, C., & Michetti, E. (2022). Nonlinear dynamics in real economy and financial markets: The role of dividend policies in fluctuations. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 160, 112191.
  20. Guthrie, G., & Hobbs, C. (2021). How managerial ownership and the market for corporate control can improve investment timing. Journal of Banking & Finance, 128, 106154.
  21. Haque, M. Z., Qian, A., Hoque, M. R., & Lucky, S. A. (2022). A unified framework for exploring the determinants of online social networks (OSNs) on institutional investors’ capital market investment decision. Technology in Society, 70, 102061.
  22. Hussain, A., & Akbar, M. (2022). Dividend policy and earnings management: Do agency problem and financing constraints matter? Borsa Istanbul Review.
  23. Iwasaki, I., Ma, X., & Mizobata, S. (2020). Corporate ownership and managerial turnover in China and Eastern Europe: A comparative meta-analysis. Journal of Economics and Business, 111, 105928.
  24. Jiang, B., & Li, J. (2015). Research on the Impact of Ownership Structure to Operation Performance of the Chinese Listed Port Companies. International Journal of E-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 2, 63–72.
  25. Karminsky, A., & Rybalka, A. (2019). An analysis of links between the ownership structure and financial stability: case of Russian companies. Procedia Computer Science, 162, 496–502.
  26. Kasahara, A., & Orihara, M. (2022). Family firms’ dividend policies: Evidence from a Japanese tax reform. Finance Research Letters, 45, 102199.
  27. Lee, Y. K. (2022). The effect of ownership structure on corporate payout policy and performance: Evidence from Korea’s exogenous dividends tax shock. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 73, 101763.
  28. Lin, S., Chen, R., Lv, Z., Zhou, T., & Jin, C. (2019). Integrated measurement of liquidity risk and market risk of company bonds based on the optimal Copula model. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 50, 101004.
  29. Liu, H. (2021). Does strengthening large shareholders’ cash flow rights reduce their expropriation motivation? Evidence from China’s dividend tax reforms. China Journal of Accounting Research, 14(4), 100206.
  30. Liu, L., & Shu, H. (2022). Mandatory dividend policy and perk consumption: Evidence from state-owned business groups in China. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 77, 101536.
  31. Ly, K. C., & Shimizu, K. (2018). Funding liquidity risk and internal markets in multi-bank holding companies: Diversification or internalization? International Review of Financial Analysis, 57, 77–89.
  32. Marks-Bielska, R. (2021). Conditions underlying agricultural land lease in Poland, in the context of the agency theory. Land Use Policy, 102, 105251.
  33. Meilita, W., & Rokhmawati, A. (2018). The Effect of Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, Foreign Ownership, Individual Ownership, Debt and Dividend Policy of Previous Years Influence on Dividend Policy. Jurnal Tepak Manajemen Bisnis, 9(2).
  34. Mishra, C. S. (2022). Does institutional ownership discourage investment in corporate R&D? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121837.
  35. Nguyen, T. T. M., & Tran, Q. T. (2022). Democracy and dividend policy around the world. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 62, 101713.
  36. Norvaišienė, R., & Stankevičienė, J. (2014). Impact of Companies’ Internal Factors on Stock Liquidity in Baltic Markets. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 543–547.
  37. Park, H., Noh, J.-H., Pedersen, M., & Lee, S. (2022). What are the determinants and managerial motivations for employee ownership in retirement pension plans? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 59, 101560.
  38. Paula Monteiro, A., Vale, J., Leite, E., Lis, M., & Kurowska-Pysz, J. (2022). The impact of information systems and non-financial information on company success. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 45, 100557.
  39. Rhou, Y., Li, Y., & Singal, M. (2019). Does managerial ownership influence franchising in restaurant companies? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 78, 122–130.
  40. Santoso, S. (2014). Statistik Non Parametrik Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan SPSS (1st ed.). Elex Media Komputindo.
  41. Shan, Y. G., Tang, Q., & Zhang, J. (2021). The impact of managerial ownership on carbon transparency: Australian evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 317, 128480.
  42. Siganos, A. (2022). Does the stock market influence investor everyday decisions? The case of parking violations. International Review of Financial Analysis, 82, 102164.
  43. Simanjuntak, D. (2019). Pengaruh Investasi, Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kepemilikan Institusional, Kebijakan Hutang, dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Kebijakan Dividen Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia 2011-2017 [Universitas Negeri Semarang].
  44. Solomon, S. J., Bendickson, J. S., Marvel, M. R., McDowell, W. C., & Mahto, R. (2021). Agency theory and entrepreneurship: A cross-country analysis. Journal of Business Research, 122, 466–476.
  45. Stereńczak, S., & Kubiak, J. (2022). dividend policy and stock liquidity: lessons from Central and eastern europe. Research in International Business and Finance, 101727.
  46. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (I). Alfabeta.
  47. Vijayakumaran, R. (2021). Impact of managerial ownership on investment and liquidity constraints: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Research in International Business and Finance, 55, 101321.
  48. Wang, K. T., & Sun, A. (2022). Institutional ownership stability and corporate social performance. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102861.
  49. Xu, J., & Huang, H. (2021). Pay more or pay less? The impact of controlling shareholders’ share pledging on firms’ dividend payouts. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 65, 101493.
  50. Yeo, H. (2016). Solvency and Liquidity in Shipping Companies. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 32(4), 235–241.
  51. Yu, X., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., & Wang, G. (2021). Dividend payouts and catering to demands: Evidence from a dividend tax reform. International Review of Financial Analysis, 77, 101841.
  52. Yusuf, F., Yousaf, A., & Saeed, A. (2018). Rethinking agency theory in developing countries: A case study of Pakistan. Accounting Forum.
  53. Zapparoli, L., Paulesu, E., Mariano, M., Ravani, A., & Sacheli, L. M. (2022). The sense of agency in joint actions: A theory-driven meta-analysis. Cortex, 148, 99–120.