Main Article Content

Abstract

Auditor is an accounting profession that is expected to be able to produce audit report products that can be accepted by both internal and external companies. The audit report must be existence and accuracy, completeness, rights and obligations, valuation or allocation, presentation and disclosure. To achieve this, several measuring tools are needed on how to determine the level of good auditor performance. The performance of professional auditors and having performance and broad insight will produce report products that can be accounted for and have reliable financial report functions and information. The research method used in this research is to use literature review, a systematic, explicit and reproducible method to identify, evaluate and synthesize research works and ideas that have been produced by researchers and practitioners. The results of this study can be concluded that good governance, audit structure, role conflict, role ambiguity, understanding of good governance, task complexity, have no effect on auditor performance. While organizational commitment, leadership style, professional training, competence, Locus of Control, and Auditor Integrity affect the performance of the auditor. For professional skepticism and audit knowledge, it turns out to have a positive and significant influence on the indications of regional loss findings.

Keywords

Skill Work Experience Professional Skepticism Auditor Performance

Article Details

How to Cite
Sunarmin, & Junaidi, A. (2022). Auditor Skill, Work Experience and Professional Skepticism on Performance of Auditors. Ilomata International Journal of Tax and Accounting, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.52728/ijtc.v3i2.453

References

  1. Anggrainy, Sri. Bokiou, Zulkifli dan Husain, Siti Pratiwi. 2018. “Analisis Perbedaan Kinerja Auditor Dilihat Dari Perpekstif Gender (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Perwakilan Provinsi Gorontalo)”, JAWARA: Jurnal Wawasan dan Riset Akuntansi, Vol. 5, No. 2, Maret 2018 hal. 114-126
  2. Agoes, Sukrisno.2012. Auditing Petunjuk Praktis Pemerksaan Akuntan Oleh Akuntan Publik, buku 1. Edisi keempat. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  3. Amandani, Ni Made Regina. Wirakusuma, Made Gede. 2017. “Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi, Gaya Kepemimpinan Dan Pelatihan Profesi Pada Kinerja Auditor” E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana Vol.19.2. Mei (2017): 916-942
  4. Brownell, Peter. 1982. The Roleeof Accounting Dataoin PerformancesEvaluation, Budgetary Participation, andeOrganizational Effectiveness. Journaloof AccountingsResearch, Vol 20, pp 12-27.
  5. Handayani, Agustuti. 2015. “Pengaruh Kemampuan, Kecakapan Dan Keterampilan Terhadap Kinerja Auditor di Kota Metro” Universitas Bandar Lampung
  6. Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan & Pelayanan Publik (e-JKPP)
  7. Jalaluddin. 2010. PengaruhoEnvironment ControllTerhadap HubunganoAntara Partisipasi Anggaran dengan Kinerja Pemerintah (Studi Empiris pada SKPD Di Kabupaten Aceh Besar). Jurnal Telaah & Riset Akuntansi. Vol. 3. N0. 1 , Hal. 84-99.
  8. Nurhayati, Yayu Sri. 2018. “Pengaruh Locus Of Control, Integritas Auditor, Dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Auditor (Studi Kasus Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Kota Bandung) Program Studi Magister Akuntansi Fakultas Eekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung
  9. Prajitno, Sugiarto. 2012. “Faktor-faktor yang Mempengarui Kinerja Akuntan Publik di Jakarta” Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi” Vol. 14, No. 3, Desembers 2012, Hlm. 181 - 192
  10. Putra, I Dewa Made Arik Permana. Sintaasih, Desak Ketut. 2018 “Efek Moderasi Skeptisme Profesional Pada Pengaruh Kompetensi Dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Auditor Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Provinsi Bali” E-Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana 7.5 (2018): 1375-1406
  11. Rengganis, Fany Dewi. Isgiyarta, Jaka. 2015, “Pengaruh Penggunaan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Kinerja Auditor” DIPONEGORO JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING, Volume 4, Nomor 2, Tahun 2015, Halaman 1-12
  12. Rahmat, Muh. Faisal. 2017. “Pengaruh Skeptisme Profesional Dan Pengetahuan Audit Terhadap Indikasi Temuan Kerugian Daerah Dengan Kecerdasan Emosional Sebagai Variabel Moderating (Studi pada Inspektorat di Kabupaten Polewali Mandar)” Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam UIN Alaudin Makassar
  13. Sari, Gisilowati Dian Purnama. Juliarto, Agung. dan Raharja. 2017 “Evaluasi Kinerja Akuntan Publik : Skeptisme Profesional dan Ooutcome Effect (Sebuah Studi Eksperimental) Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Diponegoro. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Volume 14/No. 2 Tahun 2017: 144-171
  14. Suzy Noviyanti. 2008. Skeptisme Profesional Auditor dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, Vol.5, No.1, 102- 125.
  15. Sutrisno. 2010. Pengaruh Partisipasi, Motivasi, danapelimpahan Wewenang dalam penyusunan Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial (Studi Empiris Pada Dinas Daerah dan Lembaga Teknis Daerah di Kabupaten Rembang). Tesis. Universitas Diponegoro.
  16. Venkatesh, Viswanath., Thong, James Y.L., Xu, Xin. (2012), “Consumer Acceptance And Use Of Information Technology: Extending The Unified Theory of Acceptance And Use Of Technology”, MIS Quarterly Vol. 36 No. 1 pp. 157-178/March 2012.
  17. Wright, A. (1980), “Performance appraisal of staff auditors”, The CPA Journal, Vol. 50, November, pp. 37-43.