Main Article Content


This research aims to review the implementation of automatic exchange of information (AEoI) from the perspective of its effectiveness in minimizing tax evasion and to analyze the inhibiting entities and encouraging entities in AEoI in minimizing tax evasion. The research approach used in this study is a qualitative approach with data collection techniques using in-depth interviews, observation, literature/ documentation studies and source triangulation. The results of the study conclude that the Implementation of AEoI in minimizing tax evasion so far has been quite effective according to international standards, although there are still many complete data sets that have not been fulfilled by partner countries, resulting in data provided by partner countries cannot be used by the Indonesian tax authorities. However, the performance of AEoI has not yet provided optimal results in increasing tax revenue, especially in 2020, its progress has been hampered by the Covid 19 Pandemic. On the other hand, Directorate General of Taxation (DGT) still has obstacles. There are four obstacles and challenges in AEoI, namely: First, the Reciprocity of Information Exchange (Reciprocity). Second, banking tends to be resistant to data access. Third, the lack of technology that supports AEoI. Fourth, the complexity of Conversion of Tax Revenue Data. The Entity that drives this information exchange in minimizing tax avoidance is the existence of an Information Exchange System called the "Common Transmission System (CTS).


Effectiveness Automatic Information Exchange Tax Evasion

Article Details

How to Cite
Pohan, C. A., Rahmi, N., Arimbhi, P., & Junaidi, A. (2022). Automatic Exchange of Information Review from the Perspective of its Effectives in Minimizing Tax Evasion . Ilomata International Journal of Tax and Accounting, 3(2), 117-138.


  1. Adegboye, A., Uwuigbe, U., Ojeka, S., Uwuigbe, O., Dahunsi, O., & Adegboye, K. (2022). Driving information communication technology for tax revenue mobilization in Sub-Saharan Africa. Telecommunications Policy, 46(7), 102329.
  2. Aditya, G. N. I. A. (2021). Perhitungan Kebijakan Insentif Pajak Penghasilan di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Eqien: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 8(2), 155–162.
  3. Alexeev, M., & Zakharov, N. (2022). Who profits from windfalls in oil tax revenue? Inequality, protests, and the role of corruption. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 197, 472–492.
  4. Amendolagine, V., De Pascale, G., & Faccilongo, N. (2021). International capital mobility and corporate tax revenues: How do controlled foreign company rules and innovation shape this relationship? Economic Modelling, 101, 105543.
  5. Aritonang, J. (2020). Analisis Penyebab Kekalahan DJP Pada Sengketa Pajak Sehubungan Dengan Penetapan Secara Jabatan. Simposium Nasional Keuangan Negara, 953–973.
  6. ATPETSI. (2020). DJP Akan Kembali Bertukar Data AEoI Mulai Bulan Depan. Asosiasi Tax Center Perguruan Tinggi Seluruh Indonesia.
  7. Berger, L. A., & Sikora, M. J. (1994). The Change Management Handbook: A Road Map to Corporate Transformation (1st ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  8. Brown, K. B. (2012). A Comparative Look at Regulation of Corporate Tax Avoidance (K. B. Brown (ed.)). Springer Netherlands.
  9. Butarbutar, R. (2017). Hukum Pajak Indonesia dan Internasional (O. D. Putri (ed.); 1st ed.). Gramata Publishing.
  10. Chang, Y.-M., & Sargsyan, R. (2022). Revenue-neutral or profit-neutral tariff and tax reforms under imperfect competition: Welfare implications. International Review of Economics & Finance, 80, 1–11.
  11. Febyani, Y. M., & Widodo, J. (2020). Peran AEoI Dalam Keterbukaan Informasi Pajak Untuk Meningkatkan Penerimaan Pajak di Indonesia. Dialogue: Jurnal Administrasii Publik, 2(2), 147–159.
  12. Gokhale, H. (2021). Japan’s carbon tax policy: Limitations and policy suggestions. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 3, 100082.
  13. Hemling, L., Plesner Rossing, J. C., & Hoffjan, A. (2022). The use of information technology for international transfer pricing in multinational enterprises. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 44, 100546.
  14. Indahsari, D. N., & Fitriandi, P. (2021). Pengaruh Kebijakan Insentif Pajak di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Terhadap Penerimaan PPN. Jurnal Pajak Dan Keuangan Negara (PKN), 3(1), 24–36.
  15. Ispriyarso, B. (2020). Automatic Exchange of Information (AEoI) dan Penghindaran Pajak. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(2), 172–179.
  16. Jacobsson, S., Arnäs, P. O., & Stefansson, G. (2020). Automatic information exchange between interoperable information systems: Potential improvement of access management in a seaport terminal. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 35, 100429.
  17. Knobel, A., & Meinzer, M. (2014). Automatic Exchange of Information: An Opportunity for Developing Countries to Tackle Tax Evasion and Corruption (pp. 1–57). Tax Justice Network.
  18. Kumar, S., Pandey, N., Lim, W. M., Chatterjee, A. N., & Pandey, N. (2021). What do we know about transfer pricing? Insights from bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 134, 275–287.
  19. Lahiri, K., & Yang, C. (2021). Boosting tax revenues with mixed-frequency data in the aftermath of COVID-19: The case of New York. International Journal of Forecasting.
  20. Majoral, G., Gasparín, F., & Saurí, S. (2021). Application of a Tax to E-Commerce Deliveries in Barcelona. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2675(10), 642–655.
  21. Matti, S., Nässén, J., & Larsson, J. (2022). Are fee-and-dividend schemes the savior of environmental taxation? Analyses of how different revenue use alternatives affect public support for Sweden’s air passenger tax. Environmental Science & Policy, 132, 181–189.
  22. Maydiana, A. (2022, January 2). Menyoroti Tantangan Besar Pertukaran Informasi Pajak Otomatis. Independent News, 5.
  23. Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (38th ed.). Remaja Rosdakarya.
  24. Nan, D., Tan, J., Zhang, L., Jingus, J., Wang, C., & Liu, W. (2022). Research on the remote automatic test technology of the full link of the substation relay protection fault information system. Energy Reports, 8, 1370–1380.
  25. Ndoricimpa, A. (2021). Tax reforms, civil conflicts and tax revenue performance in Burundi. Scientific African, 13, e00927.
  26. Neraca, A. (2015, September 16). Praktik Transfer Pricing Sebabkan Indonesia Rugi Rp100 T. Okezone, 15.
  27. Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
  28. Pablo, S. (2019, March 18). Sri Mulyani Kejar Temuan Dana WNI Rp 1.300 T di Luar Negeri. CNBC Indonesia, 6.
  29. Padyanoor, A. (2020). Kebijakan Pajak Indonesia Menanggapi Krisis COVID-19: Manfaat bagi Wajib Pajak. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(9), 2216.
  30. Pohan, C. A. (2019). Pedoman Lengkap Pajak Internasional (2nd ed.). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  31. Pohan, C. A. (2021). Kebijakan dan Administrasi Perpajakan Daerah di Indonesia (1st ed.). Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  32. Sarwoko, J. (2012). Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 2239K/PID.SUS/ 2012 (p. 679). Mahkamah Agung.
  33. Selvi. (2018). Automatic Exchange of Information sebagai Big Data di Bidang Perpajakan. Transparansi Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, 1(1), 128–133.
  34. Siswanto, D. (2022, February 13). Ini Kekurangan Ditjen Pajak Kemenkeu dalam Memanfaatkan Data AEoI. Tabloid Kontan, 5.
  35. Steens, B., Roques, T., Gonnet, S., Beuselinck, C., & Petutschnig, M. (2022). Transfer pricing comparables: Preferring a close neighbor over a far-away peer? Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 100471.
  36. Stefano, G. da S., Antunes, T. dos S., Lacerda, D. P., Morandi, M. I. W. M., & Piran, F. S. (2022). The impacts of inventory in transfer pricing and net income: Differences between traditional accounting and throughput accounting. The British Accounting Review, 54(2), 101001.
  37. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (I). Alfabeta.
  38. Supriyadi. (2019). Automatic Exchange of Information sebagai Sarana Meningkatkan Empat Pilar Kepatuhan Pajak. Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi, 6(2), 114–123.
  39. Suwiknyo, E. (2020a). Tiga Tahun Berjalan, Ini Perkembangan Pertukaran Informasi Keuangan. Ekonomi Bisnis.
  40. Suwiknyo, E. (2020b, November 2). Pertukaran Data Informasi Keuangan Berlanjut. Bisnis Indonesia, 5.
  41. Tempo, M. (2014, April). Prahara Pajak Raja Otomotif. Rubrik Investigasi Majalah Tempo, 30.
  42. Tibulca, I.-L. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tax revenues in the EU. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1–18.
  43. Wantasen, M. A., Sondakh, J. J., & Suwetja, I. G. (2021). Analisis Penerimaan Pajak Sebelum dan Sesudah Adanya Insentif Pajak Bagi Wajib Pajak yang Terdampak Covid-19 Selama Masa Pandemi Pada KPP Pratama Manado. Going Concern : Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 16(4), 387–397.
  44. Wibowo, J. L. (2017). AEOI dan Kesiapan Indonesia. Artikel Direktorat Jenderal Pajak.
  45. Yang, S., Guo, J., & Wei, R. (2017). Semantic interoperability with heterogeneous information systems on the internet through automatic tabular document exchange. Information Systems, 69, 195–217.
  46. Zarghami, S. A. (2021). A reflection on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Australian businesses: Toward a taxonomy of vulnerabilities. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 64, 102496.
  47. Zucman, G. (2015). The Hidden Wealth of Nations: The Scourge of Tax Havens (1st ed.). The University of Chicago Press.

Most read articles by the same author(s)