Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 730 Download : 9410

Main Article Content

Abstract

The Covid 19 pandemic in almost all countries, including Indonesia, has negatively impacted the economic sector, especially the MSME business. The government has made various efforts to restore the Indonesian economy. Through the Directorate General of Taxes, under the authority of the Ministry of Finance, the government decided to provide tax incentives for taxpayers affected by the Covid 19 pandemic. This final income tax incentive is based on the Regulation of the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia No. 44 PMK/03/2020. This regulation focuses on Small and Medium Enterprises. Taxes are usually 0.5% of gross income that is self-paid or deducted or collected by withholders or collectors. However, with PMK-44/PMK.03/2020, the tax is borne by the government, which means that the income is not subjected to tax from April 2020 to December 2020. This study used a descriptive method. The data was collected through a literature study where the author evaluated the implementation of government regulatory policies regarding applying tax incentives for MSMEs affected by Covid-19. The purpose of providing tax incentives to MSMEs is to reduce their difficulty in meeting operational costs or expenses so that MSMEs can survive during the pandemic, as well as save the national economy and maintain financial system stability. The study results show that tax incentives and relaxation and the provision of tax incentives to the beneficiary sector MSME are productive and able to support the recovery of the national economy. These programs and tactical steps ensure that economic growth is maintained even though these programs are separate and unrelated to the spread of Covid-19, which can be controlled quickly.

Keywords

Evaluation incentives taxes SMEs

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Wulandari, W., Teron, F. C. K., Agustina, D., & Rofiyanti, E. (2022). Evaluation of the Implementation of Tax Incentive Policy for Small and Medium Enterprises Affected by the Covid-19 Pandemic at the Tax Service Office Pratama Koja Utara Jakarta. Ilomata International Journal of Tax and Accounting, 3(2), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijtc.v3i2.476

References

  1. Amendolagine Andrew, R., & Sari, D. P. (2021). Insentif PMK 86/2020 Di Tengah Pandemi Covid 19: Apakah Mempengaruhi Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak UMKM Di Surabaya? Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pajak, 21(02). https://doi.org/10.29040/jap.v21i02.1597
  2. Anugerah, A. R., Muttaqin, P. S., & Purnama, D. A. (2021). Effect of large-scale social restriction (PSBB) during COVID-19 on outdoor air quality: Evidence from five cities in DKI Jakarta Province, Indonesia. Environmental Research, 197, 111164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111164
  3. Arianto, B. (2020). Pengembangan UMKM Digital di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. ATRABIS: Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 6(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38204/atrabis.v6i2.512
  4. Benvenutti, L. M. M., Ribeiro, A. B., Forcellini, F. A., & Maldonado, M. U. (2016). The Effectiveness of Tax Incentive Policies in the Diffusion of Electric and Hybrid Cars in Brazil. 41o Congresso Latinoamericano de Dinamica de Sistemas, November, 1–11.
  5. Beny, I. K., & Loviana Dewi, M. (2021). Implementasi Kebijakan Pemungutan Pajak Atas Transaksi Perdagangan Melalui E-Commerce Di Indonesia. Jurnal Locus Delicti, 2(2), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.23887/jld.v2i2.462
  6. Chen, M., Kang, Q., Wu, J., & Jeon, B. N. (2022). Do macroprudential policies affect bank efficiency? Evidence from emerging economies. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 77, 101529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101529
  7. Ciesielska, M., Rizun, N., & Chabik, J. (2022). Assessment of E-government inclusion policies toward seniors: A framework and case study. Telecommunications Policy, 46(7), 102316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102316
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed (S. Z. Qudsy (ed.); 3rd ed.). Pustaka Pelajar. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1213690
  9. Damayanti, N. N. S. R. (2021). Menjaga Eksistensi Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. EKONIKA Jurnal Ekonomi Universitas Kadiri, 6(1), 130. https://doi.org/10.30737/ekonika.v6i1.1454
  10. Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public Policy Analysis: An Integrated Approach (3rd ed.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://www.routledge.com/Public-Policy-Analysis-An-Integrated-Approach/Dunn/p/book/9781138743847#
  11. Egbunike, F. C., Emudainohwo, O. B., & Gunardi, A. (2018). Tax Revenue and Economic Growth: A Study of Nigeria and Ghana. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 7(2), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjie.v7i2.7341
  12. Febyani, Y. M., & Widodo, J. (2020). Peran AEoI Dalam Keterbukaan Informasi Pajak Untuk Meningkatkan Penerimaan Pajak di Indonesia. Dialogue: Jurnal Administrasii Publik, 2(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/dialogue.v2i2.9921
  13. Figueroa, D., Galeana-Pizaña, J. M., Núñez, J. M., Anzaldo Gómez, C., Hernández-Castro, J. R., Sánchez-Ramírez, M. del M., & Garduño, A. (2021). Assessing drivers and deterrents of deforestation in Mexico through a public policy tool. The adequacy of the index of economic pressure for deforestation. Forest Policy and Economics, 133, 102608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102608
  14. Holzer, D., Rauter, R., Fleiß, E., & Stern, T. (2021). Mind the gap: Towards a systematic circular economy encouragement of small and medium-sized companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126696
  15. Kementerian Keuangan. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan No 44/PMK.03/2020 Tentang Insentif Pajak untuk Wajib Pajak Terdampak Pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Vol. 19). https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/fullText/2020/44~PMK.03~2020Per.pdf
  16. Kumala, R., & Junaidi, A. (2020). Strategi Bisnis Dan Pemanfaatan Kebijakan Pajak Di Masa Pandemi COVID-19 Dan Era New Normal (Studi Kasus Pelaku UKM Marketplace). Prosiding Seminar STIAMI, 7(2), 98–103. https://ojs.stiami.ac.id/index.php/PS/article/view/960
  17. Kurniawan, M. B. (2021). Politik Hukum Pemerintah dalam Penanganan Pandemi Covid-19 Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hak Asasi atas Kesehatan. Jurnal HAM, 12(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2021.12.37-56
  18. Kusumastuti, A. D. (2020). Pengaruh Pandemi Covid-19 terhadap Eksistensi Bisnis UMKM dalam mempertahankan Business Continuity Management (BCM). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Fisipol Unmul, 8(3), 224. https://doi.org/10.54144/jadbis.v8i3.4188
  19. Malik, A., Aulawi, H., & Setiawan, R. (2020). Sistem Informasi Potensi Investasi Terintegrasi Menggunakan Scrum Agile. Jurnal Algoritma, 16(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.33364/algoritma/v.16-2.108
  20. Mardiasmo. (2006). Perwujudan Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Publik Melalui Akuntansi Sektor Publik: Suatu Sarana Good Governance. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah, 2(1), 1–17. http://opac.lib.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=book_detail&sub=BookDetail&act=view&typ=htmlext&buku_id=753019&unit_id=200
  21. Mardiasmo. (2016). Perpajakan (Mardiasmo (ed.); 3rd ed.). Andi Publishing. http://www.library.usd.ac.id/web/index.php?pilih=search&p=1&q=0000133697&go=Detail
  22. Marlina, L., & Syahribulan, S. (2021). Peranan Insentif Pajak Yang Di Tanggung Pemerintah (DTP) Di Era Pandemi Covid 19. Economy Deposit Journal (E-DJ), 2(2). https://doi.org/10.36090/e-dj.v2i2.910
  23. Masdi, A. (2021). Menakar Penerimaan Pajak di Tahun Pandemi. Artikel & Opini Kementerian Keuangan. https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/publikasi/artikel-dan-opini/menakar-penerimaan-pajak-di-tahun-pandemi/
  24. Muhyiddin, M., & Nugroho, H. (2021). A Year of Covid-19: A Long Road to Recovery and Acceleration of Indonesia’s Development. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v5i1.181
  25. Nabilah, S., Nursan, M., & Suparyana, P. K. (2021). Dampak Pandemi Covid-19 Terhadap UMKM (Studi Kasus Umkm Zea Food Di Kota Mataram). Jurnal Inovasi Penellitian, 1(12), 2655–2660. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47492/jip.v1i12.438
  26. Nguyen, H. T., & Darsono, S. N. A. C. (2022). The Impacts of Tax Revenue and Investment on the Economic Growth in Southeast Asian Countries. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 23(1), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v23i1.13270
  27. Priyatin, N. N., & Rahmi, N. (2022). Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Insentif Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 21 Ditanggung Pemerintah di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Pada KPP Pratama Jakarta Pademangan Tahun 2020. JUPASI:Jurnal Pajak Vokasi, 3(2), 86–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31334/jupasi.v3i2.2210
  28. Rahmah, N. A. (2020). The Impact of Covid-19 on Micro, Small, Medium Enterprises (UMKM) In Indonesia. Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari. https://www.academia.edu/42694142/Karya_Tulis_Ilmiah_Nadia_Amalia_Rahmah
  29. Rahmawati, E., & Apriliasari, V. (2021). Insentif PPH Final Ditanggung Pemerintah Selama Pandemi Covid-19 Bagi UMKM yang Memiliki Peredaran Bruto Tertentu. Jurnal Pajak Dan Keuangan Negara (PKN), 3(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.31092/jpkn.v3i1.1273
  30. Resmi, S., & Barmawi, M. M. (2022). Pemanfaatan Insentif Pajak Untuk UMKM di Masa Pandemi Covid 19. Jurnal Berdaya Mandiri, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31316/jbm.v4i1.1852
  31. Rofiyanti, E., Santiko, A., Susetyo, I. B., Agustina, D., & Razikin, K. (2021). Local Wisdom And Regional Policy In The Implementation of Friendly Basic Service Covid 19. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 2(3), 190–194. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijss.v2i3.295
  32. Roman, M., & Plopeanu, A.-P. (2021). The effectiveness of the emergency eLearning during COVID-19 pandemic. The case of higher education in economics in Romania. International Review of Economics Education, 37, 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2021.100218
  33. Santhosh, M., & Baral, R. (2015). A Conceptual Framework for Exploring the Impacts of Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes and Behaviour. Journal of Human Values, 21(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685815594270
  34. Sarjono, B. (2021). Dampak Insentif PPH Pasal 21 Saat Pandemi Covid-19 Terhadap Take Home Pay dan Pelaporan SPT Tahunan. Jurnal Bisnis Terapan, 5(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.24123/jbt.v5i2.4531
  35. Sekiraqa, A., Sekiraça, E., Sekiraqa, V., & Ahmeti, S. (2021). The impact of COVID – 19 on Collecting of Tax Revenues in Kosovo. SHS Web of Conferences, 114, 01031. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111401031
  36. Silalahi, U. (2017). Metode Penelitian Sosial (A. Gunarsa (ed.); 4th ed.). Refika Aditama. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=694081
  37. Simshauser, P. (2019). Missing money, missing policy and Resource Adequacy in Australia’s National Electricity Market. Utilities Policy, 60, 100936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2019.100936
  38. Subarsono, A. G. (2019). Analisis Kebijakan Publik (1st ed.). Pustaka Pelajar. https://pustakapelajar.co.id/buku/analisis-kebijakan-publik/
  39. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (I). Alfabeta. https://cvalfabeta.com/product/metode-penelitian-kuantitatif-kualitatif-dan-rd-mpkk/
  40. Sukhwani, V., Napitupulu, H., Jingnan, D., Yamaji, M., & Shaw, R. (2021). Enhancing cultural adequacy in post-disaster temporary housing. Progress in Disaster Science, 11, 100186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2021.100186
  41. Tibulca, I.-L. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tax revenues in the EU. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1954967
  42. Tripon, A. (2015). Requirements on Organizational Encouragement and Resources for the Development of Entrepreneurial Creativity in a Glocal Social–ecological System Case Study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32, 906–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01543-9
  43. Voronov, M., Chasovskykh, V., Popov, V., Anyanova, E., & Krainova, T. (2015). Effectiveness Research of the new Learning Elements, Initiated by the Change to Competency-based Education Model in Russia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 758–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.712
  44. Wan, Q., Chen, J., Yao, Z., & Yuan, L. (2022). Preferential tax policy and R&D personnel flow for technological innovation efficiency of China’s high-tech industry in an emerging economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121228
  45. Wantasen, M. A., Sondakh, J. J., & Suwetja, I. G. (2021). Analisis Penerimaan Pajak Sebelum dan Sesudah Adanya Insentif Pajak Bagi Wajib Pajak yang Terdampak Covid-19 Selama Masa Pandemi Pada KPP Pratama Manado. Going Concern : Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 16(4), 387–397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32400/gc.16.4.37587.2021
  46. Wardana, A. B. (2021). Menakar Keadilan Pajak Penghasilan dan Insentif bagi UMKM di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia, 5(2), 192–205. https://jurnal.pknstan.ac.id/index.php/JPI/article/download/1406/731/5941
  47. Yang, M., Hong, Y., & Yang, F. (2022). The effects of Mandatory Energy Efficiency Policy on resource allocation efficiency: Evidence from Chinese industrial sector. Economic Analysis and Policy, 73, 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.11.012
  48. Zapata, S., Castaneda, M., Aristizabal, A. J., & Dyner, I. (2022). Renewables for supporting supply adequacy in Colombia. Energy, 239, 122157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122157
  49. Zhang, J., Luo, Y., & Ding, X. (2022). Can green credit policy improve the overseas investment efficiency of enterprises in China? Journal of Cleaner Production, 340, 130785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130785

Most read articles by the same author(s)